British OOB June 1944 - additional formations?

[gila]

[quote=Cross;726437}

With a crew of one and a carry capacity of two. A MC sidecar would be a size 1 (compared to jeep size 2) and would be slightly faster than a jeep, and available from the start of the war (jeeps become available Sept 1941).

My experience is that MC units are quite vulnerable in SP; and you'd probably get better point/usefulness value with jeeps. This should keep them from overuse.


Cross[/QUOTE]

Both are almost just as vulnerable,

Trouble is a jeep can get stuck,as a MC is easily pushed out and goes over rough handily.

Jeep over MC? i'll take an MC.

[gila]

[quote=gila;726505]

Originally Posted by Cross;726437}

With a crew of one and a carry capacity of two. A MC sidecar would be a size 1 (compared to jeep size 2) and would be slightly faster than a jeep, and available from the start of the war (jeeps become available Sept 1941).

My experience is that MC units are quite vulnerable in SP; and you'd probably get better point/usefulness value with jeeps. This should keep them from overuse.


Cross[/QUOTE

Both are almost just as vulnerable,

Trouble is a jeep can get stuck,as a MC is easily pushed out and goes over rough handily.

Jeep over MC? i'll take an MC.

One last thing John,

The U.S. never realized the Opportunity's (is that correct phrase) of the MC in warfare either during WW2.