|
|
|
View Poll Results: Trading commanders is an exploit?
|
Yes
|
  
|
5 |
10.64% |
No
|
  
|
42 |
89.36% |

January 28th, 2010, 01:15 AM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Finland
Posts: 812
Thanks: 106
Thanked 57 Times in 34 Posts
|
|
Re: Trading commanders, exploit or not?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baalz
Exploiting sneak, attack, sneak, attack to avoid almost any retaliation?
Exploiting (potentially) blocking enemy movement by moving a large chaff force into them?
Exploiting moving a smallish force in on the magic phase to get your opponent to burn through gems before the main event in the movement phase?
|
I agree with the rest of your list, but you consider these exploits? Err huh? Basically you don't like Pangaea that much then, do you? These are the standard tactics for Pangaea (raid with sneaky armies, block armies with maeanads, cast call of the wild before the main attack)?
If these would be considered exploits, I'd like to see someone explain how you can play with Pangaea. Using sneaky forces and maenads and remote spells *is* what Pangaea is about, at least in my opinion. Means Pangaea can recuit Minotaur commanders and Minotaurs trooper only, huh?
I am honestly quite baffled.
__________________
There are three kinds of people: Those who can count and those who can not.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Threaded Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|