Info: 5.0 patch for winSPMBT

[shilka77]

Marcello understood yes I can only Imagine that wikipedia is not the source to be looking into when it comes to this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_...%27s_Air_Force

I checked other places that before showed their SAM inventory these places has been updated and I can't find any SP-SAM there either this only reinforce the skill and knowledge you lads shows when working with this game.

The game is great and the updates are awesome. Thank you again for all your time put into this project.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/milita...prk/index.html

[Marcello]

Originally Posted by shilka77

Marcello understood yes I can only Imagine that wikipedia is not the source to be looking into when it comes to this.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Korean_...%27s_Air_Force

I checked other places that before showed their SAM inventory these places has been updated and I can't find any SP-SAM there either this only reinforce the skill and knowledge you lads shows when working with this game.

Wikipedia lists both SA-6 and SA-17, both SP-SAM but there is not much in the way of confirmation of that elsewhere.
Sources generally list SA-2/3/5 as far as heavy SAMs go and only few mentions SA-6, with no further details such as number or units.
I suppose that a small number of SA-6 might be there but it is not clear; in any case the SA-6 is not very mobile, not particularly good by today standards, I have heard it being compared unfavorably to the SA-3 in some ways. Some of their fixed SA-2/3/5 sites may give some coverage even in South Korea territory but such weapons, SA-6 included, are simply too old to withstand modern jamming and SEAD techniques.

[Mobhack]

Originally Posted by Marcello

Wikipedia lists both SA-6 and SA-17, both SP-SAM but there is not much in the way of confirmation of that elsewhere.
Sources generally list SA-2/3/5 as far as heavy SAMs go and only few mentions SA-6, with no further details such as number or units.
I suppose that a small number of SA-6 might be there but it is not clear; in any case the SA-6 is not very mobile, not particularly good by today standards, I have heard it being compared unfavorably to the SA-3 in some ways. Some of their fixed SA-2/3/5 sites may give some coverage even in South Korea territory but such weapons, SA-6 included, are simply too old to withstand modern jamming and SEAD techniques.

This thread is about the 5.0 patch, not micro-details of a particular OOB.

If you want to have a detailed discussion about some OOB, then please open up a new thread for that discussion in the TO&E forum.

Andy