Attn: Richard/Malfador: Palace use idea

Jmenschenfresser · #1 July 23rd, 2002, 10:37 PM

You know, come to think of it, why doesn't this game contain some sort of order/command aspect like quite a few wargames.

Either every command or perhaps only every military command takes an order.

geoschmo · #2 July 23rd, 2002, 10:39 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by jimbob:
I guess you could give everyone one of these at the start of the game, and then make the facility really expensive to build... I'm talking astronomically expensive.

That is certainly an option. Two problems with it though are if you have a multi planet start, you would get one on each homeworld, not just one for the empire. And secondly, if they are astronomically expensive you can't rebuild them if destroyed. That would be allright for some people, that is what they prefer for the palaces. But others are of the opinion you should be able to rebuild it if destroyed, or relocate it if needed. But just not have more than one at anyone time.

Geo

thorfrog · #3 July 23rd, 2002, 10:44 PM

All good points. That why I put it to the attn of Malfador. Maybe they could add some more functionality to this excellent game. The ability to limit only one structure shouldn't be to hard for them to add. Also adding an emipire wide effect would be very cool too. It shouldn't even effect the current AI.

I hope they consider this addition.

[ July 23, 2002, 21:44: Message edited by: atomannj ]

Ed Kolis · #4 July 24th, 2002, 12:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Puke:
and if youre really dippy: you build your palace on top of a swamp, have it burnt and sacked twice, and keep rebuilding it in the same danm place out of pure stubborn arogance.

Haha!!! Am I the only one to get the joke??? It's the White House dummies!!!

tesco samoa · #5 July 24th, 2002, 12:20 AM

or.... a quote from memory from the holy grail

jimbob · #6 July 24th, 2002, 12:45 AM

RE: sacked and burned twice

Quote:

It's the White House dummies!!!

Sorry, no. The White House was only successfully sacked and burned once, by (IMHO) Canadian troops acting under the British Flag. It is my understanding that the buffet was quite good

Puke · #7 July 24th, 2002, 01:32 AM

Canadians.. phooey. the Brits burned the thing in 1814. there might have been a few Canadians along for the ride, but the way i hear it, they were too drunk to participate. hell, i dont even think canada was an independant country then. Proudest moment in Canadian history, sheesh. I think you guys would be more proud of your astounding performance in WWI rather than your minor involvement in the burning of a city that you didn't have all that much to do with.

my history isnt the best though, because the incident i was thinking of when was washington burned for the second time in 1864, it was actually Washington, NC. heck, for all I know, the Canadians could be responsible for that one too. chalk up the 1989 earthquake to them, too.

ah well, if its any consolation, we set the roof on fire in the 1920s. i dont think there was so much sacking involved for that, though.