Re: Freaky diplomacy AI
There should be a difference between commercial and military treaties. Military treaties should allow the counterpart to fly through the partners territory without increasing anger while commercial should not (everybody wants to trade with China, but who wants to have Chinese troops stationnned on his territory ?). Furthermore, there should be more distinction between a "normal" military treaty and a Partnership. The AI anger files should specify separate lines for these treaties, especially with regard to intersettling.
A question: has anybody noticed that the AI is more inclined to accept non-aggression and non-intercourse agreements than trade alliances. From my viewpoint it should, but it does not seem to be the case.
|
Hybrid Mode
