Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian61
The MG34 and MG42 were superior weapons, if you check the actual specifications with the Laffette mount which included integral indirect fire control and the Tiefenfeuerautomat fire control, the 44 range may actually be a bit too pessimistic.
|
The reputations of MG34 and MG42 have been a little embellished. They are good weapons in many ways. Some argue that the MG 34 was actually the better weapon. Tougher, heavier, more reliable, more accurate, with a longer a barrel, and less prone to jerk off target when fired, and it had semi-auto. The MG42 overheats even more rapidly than the MG34, but the barrel is quicker to change.
In the game the MG34 and MG42 HMGs already get an accuracy bonus that other HMGs don’t get. The MG34 gets ACC 25 when it would normally be 20, the MG42 gets 22 when it would be 17.
I agree that both guns can shoot further than 2200m, but so can other tripod MGs. The German guns had a lower muzzle velocity and shorter barrel than some Allied MGs.
The range drum on the Vickers went up to 4500 yards, and the gun came with range finder and telescopic director. And it was water cooled with a much longer barrel than even the MG34.
I don’t think we’re trying to model the longest range that a MG can kill man, as that would be way above the current ranges, but what is a sensible effective range for various tri-pod MGs in the game. Should German HMGs really shoot 33% further than similar Allied weapons?
Cross