|
|
|
|
|
October 15th, 2007, 05:52 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 409
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: mod: A Role playing MA Pangaea Faction
oh, yeah early mistake for new modders, I'm surprised i didn't clear it up for you.
Some users can't open .rar files so you have to post everything in .zip
|
October 15th, 2007, 02:19 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: France
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: mod: A Role playing MA Pangaea Faction
ZIP file in attachment
|
October 29th, 2007, 06:04 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,445
Thanks: 85
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: mod: A Role playing MA Pangaea Faction
I'd just like to mention that, although I'm all in favor of variety, and you've done a lot of good work here, if you want to keep things mythologically consistent, then harpies only come in the female variety.
A male harpy might make a nice hero or other rare unit, with a backstory, but to add them just to correct a *percieved* lack, for the sake of roleplaying, rather than to add a new and useful unit, would be false in this particular case. It would be like adding another eye to the cyclops, just because human beings happen to have two eyes.
Dryads are the same, all female, and wedded to their trees.
Ofcourse, you're free to do what you like.
__________________
You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
|
October 29th, 2007, 11:16 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: mod: A Role playing MA Pangaea Faction
But in Dom3 Pangaea they aren't mythological creatures, they're a common race, like the birds you might find in your garden. Look at how many die in PD efforts. I don't think it's unreasonable to think they have male and female sexes.
|
October 30th, 2007, 07:12 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: country of stinky fromages
Posts: 564
Thanks: 29
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: mod: A Role playing MA Pangaea Faction
It's true for all the factions in the game, why not a female Illithid ? I don't see why pangaea would need to have all units in twice the number needed. In most human civs, women are expected to take care of children (at medieval time).
So why the children of pangaea couldn't have their mother/father at home ?
It just seem to make redundant units. Only the true new units(ie : dryad slinger) are interesting, because I think pangaea could use a more diverse OB.
__________________
10 times more numerous, by nigth and backstabbing.
Senior member of the GLIN !
|
October 30th, 2007, 07:16 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: mod: A Role playing MA Pangaea Faction
Why not a female illithid? Because Quenetar hasn't made a mod improving Rlyeh yet.
This mod isn't my cup of tea at all, but I can understand what he was going for and I think he made a great job of it.
|
April 23rd, 2013, 11:55 AM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: France
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: A Role playing MA Pangaea Faction
Hi all,
After several years (!) I had give an update to my old mod : Pangaea Improved.
A few tweaks and some improvements. The biggest change is to also alter early pangaea and late pangaea.
The v1.02 mod file is in the first post of the thread.
Quenetar.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Quenetar For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|