|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
    
        | Notices |  
        | 
	Do you own this game?  Write a review  and let others know how you like it.
 |  
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 24th, 2014, 12:07 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Yorkshire, UK 
						Posts: 1,066
					 Thanks: 388 
		
			
				Thanked 455 Times in 327 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 Sorry forgot to add redone SHP file: (file attached [zipped])  |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to scorpio_rocks For This Useful Post: |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 24th, 2014, 01:00 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Lieutenant General |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Salt Lake City, UT 
						Posts: 2,829
					 Thanks: 542 
		
			
				Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 If you're working on a campaign instead of a single stand-alone scenario one thing I've found useful is to create a "Base Scenario" using a blank map and buying/modifying all the units your campaign will use.
 Then as you create each actual campaign scenario you can just load that "Base Scenario" into the editor and either set any units the particular scenario doesn't use to reinforce on turn 49 (presuming your scenario is shorter then that) or delete them (not as good if you want to keep campaign integrity).
 
 This way you need only mess with the whole formation/unit alteration process once, and don't need to muck with the OOB.
 
				__________________Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
 
 People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
 
 "Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 28th, 2014, 12:10 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me. 
						Posts: 878
					 Thanks: 584 
		
			
				Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 After loading the revised shp file 184 that includes the elevator, while I can see the graphic in ShpEd as image #11 AND image #17, the ship elevator does not appear in the Purchase screen under Ammo Carrier. In the OOB013, in slot #963 the ship elevator is listed, however there's no associated icon.
 I'm thinking I've screwed something up, but at this point am at a lost as to how to rectify this issue.
 
 HELP
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 29th, 2014, 01:57 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Yorkshire, UK 
						Posts: 1,066
					 Thanks: 388 
		
			
				Thanked 455 Times in 327 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by shahadi  I'm thinking I've screwed something up, but at this point am at a lost as to how to rectify this issue.
 HELP
 |  More likley explanation is: I messed up somewhere - sorry!
 
I am currently working on redoing all files and scenario from scratch to avoid any issues - give me a week or so pls. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				August 29th, 2014, 11:35 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me. 
						Posts: 878
					 Thanks: 584 
		
			
				Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by scorpio_rocks  
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by shahadi  I'm thinking I've screwed something up, but at this point am at a lost as to how to rectify this issue.
 HELP
 |  More likley explanation is: I messed up somewhere - sorry!
 
I am currently working on redoing all files and scenario from scratch to avoid any issues - give me a week or so pls. |  No problem. Take your time, I've been on the Red Line Syria project nearly a year. Currently, investigating Syrian Mech & Infantry TO&Es, and AI Mech Infantry assaults. So yeah, I get it, a big learning opportunity, and I know zilch of making mods. 
 
Thanks man, ur okay with this project in my book. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 2nd, 2014, 12:50 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me. 
						Posts: 878
					 Thanks: 584 
		
			
				Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by scorpio_rocks  // Icon0184.shp -- Invisible turret Icons.  (Icons 7800-7813 created/ammended by Scorpio_Rocks)
 {18400, 6976},  // 7800  Pirate Skiff
 {18401, 6976},  // 7801  Gunboat
 {18402, 6976},  // 7802  Pirate "Mothership"
 {18403, 6976},  // 7803  Syrian Compact Missile Boat
 {18404, 6976},  // 7804  Suicide Inflatable
 {18405, 6976},  // 7805  Patrol Ship (Spain)
 {18406, 6976},  // 7806  Container Ship (small)
 {18407, 6976},  // 7807  US Patrol Vessel
 {18408, 6976},  // 7808  LHD Deck - 5
 {18409, 6976},  // 7809  LHD Elevator
 {18410, 6976},  // 7810  LHD Deck Landing Pad
 {18411, 6976},  // 7811  LHD Bridge
 {18413, 6976},  // 7813  LHD Airborne Operations Island
 {18414, 6976},  // 7814  RHIB
 
 |  In trying to understand the Shp file/icon process I have thus far understood that "18409" translates into 184 as the Icon Shp file with the identification "09" as pointer to the image in the Shp file. Now, when I inspect the  Icon0184.shp file with the Shp Editor I note the elevator icon occupies the 11th place in the file not the 9th. Meaning, the reference should read "18411" rather than "18409."
Question:  How does Mobhack link unit with icon? Does Mobhack read a config file to associate units, icons, and pictures?
			
			
			
			
				  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				September 2nd, 2014, 05:03 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Yorkshire, UK 
						Posts: 1,066
					 Thanks: 388 
		
			
				Thanked 455 Times in 327 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 as I understand it:
 the shp file has an "extra" placeholder type picture (usually 2 tank silhouettes and MBT) in first position visually. The first actual position is number 0 (zero). Therfore every picture counted visually through the shp is 2 numbers lower in the identification number.
 
 Place holder, 0 , 1 , 2, 3, 4, etc (4 in this example is the 6th image)
 
 The entry in the file "WINSPMBT_MasterIconList.txt" in the design sub directory of the game data directory gives = {icon, turret}, // icon id "description so for example:
 {18409, 6976},  // 7809  LHD Elevator = {shp184 11th image, "invisible" turret}, // icon7809 (for mobhack) description LHD Elevator.
 
 TBH I have no idea how the game "looks up" this information, I think it is hard coded and therefore new icons must be in the right "kind" of empty shp file (ie turreted, un turreted, invisible turret).
 
 Hope this helps.
 
 (ps to add icon to shp file create .bmp file of right size then add using shpedit utility)
 |  
	
		
			| The Following User Says Thank You to scorpio_rocks For This Useful Post: |  |  |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				December 21st, 2014, 01:33 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Yorkshire, UK 
						Posts: 1,066
					 Thanks: 388 
		
			
				Thanked 455 Times in 327 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 Sorry for the ongoing delays folks:
 I am having HUGE problems getting the AI to attack the ship.
 I may have to (if there is enough interest...) split into two scenarios to cover te attacks from each side (Yemen/Somalia).
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 13th, 2015, 04:49 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Captain |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: I ain't in Kansas anymore, just north of where Dorothy clicked her heels is where you'll find me. 
						Posts: 878
					 Thanks: 584 
		
			
				Thanked 277 Times in 191 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by scorpio_rocks  Sorry for the ongoing delays folks:
 I am having HUGE problems getting the AI to attack the ship.
 I may have to (if there is enough interest...) split into two scenarios to cover te attacks from each side (Yemen/Somalia).
 |  Is it realistic to model Somali's attacking a carrier battle group? Would that not conjure up an image of the Santa Maria going up against the USS Iowa. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				January 13th, 2015, 02:38 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2013 Location: Yorkshire, UK 
						Posts: 1,066
					 Thanks: 388 
		
			
				Thanked 455 Times in 327 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: "Rusty Nickel" at the Gateway of Tears 
 
	Quote: 
	
		| 
					Originally Posted by shahadi  Is it realistic to model Somali's attacking a carrier battle group? Would that not conjure up an image of the Santa Maria going up against the USS Iowa. |  Absolutely which is why the scenario was set up to "artificially" create a situation where the ship is alone(ish) and immobile, allowing all the beligerents in the area a "too-good-to-miss" oportunity.   |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| Thread Tools |  
	|  |  
	| Display Modes |  
	
	| 
		 Linear Mode |  
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |