.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPWW2
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 11th, 2018, 07:33 PM
Mobhack's Avatar

Mobhack Mobhack is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
Mobhack is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AP vs Bunker/Pillboxes

Bunkers are already treated as not 100% proof - some effect from non-penetrating hits does "leak through" and kill defenders. But bunker crews are usually quite large...

With AP, it is best to manoeuvre till you get a shot at the weakest face - which is usually the firing slit at the front. AP has less HE kill effect, so if knocking on the sides He works best - try using e,g the SU-152 that has an all-HE load-out.

In MBT, bunkers are suicide machines from the time that 105mm APDS etc is common since the penetration scores of those over-match most field fortifications, though there are some "fortress" types with high defences. In MBT. If defending then about the only bunker type I look at is the ones with the 360 degree HMG as a good suppressor while they last and use those to protect a few with a Milan or similar, with TI vision. In WW2, the AT bunkers with a decent ATG are my go-to items, if thee is somewhere to plonk them with a good field of fire, and hopefully the enemy wont cover them with smoke (the simple counter till you get ones with TI in MBT).

The main advantage of bunkers though is that they do resist an artillery preparatory bombardment rather well, better than troops in trenches other than a fire trench/AT Ditch. So if your regular opponent likes to "mow the lawn" with a creeping barrage, they can be handy. But using the points on mines or dragons teeth is probably a better investment until those that can see through smoke arrive.

In WW2, a section of 2 Marders which will dig in, and can then move to react to the enemy (if the barrage does not do them in!) is maybe even better.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
  #12  
Old July 13th, 2018, 06:18 AM
Imp's Avatar

Imp Imp is offline
General
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
Imp is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AP vs Bunker/Pillboxes

Noticed earlier posts mentioned long campaigns, if you have one or 2 tanks with high experience these are your bunker busters.
90 plus experience close up stationary firer you stand a good chance of a critical hit after a few shots at the same target.
Same goes for engineers with FT demo charges, do not move and attack in the same turn, a bit of patience pays dividends.
__________________
John
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Imp For This Useful Post:
  #13  
Old February 28th, 2019, 01:17 AM

jivemi jivemi is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 505
Thanks: 432
Thanked 148 Times in 104 Posts
jivemi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AP vs Bunker/Pillboxes

Sorry to be a pain about this but in a just-completed battle as Brits vs Italians in late 1940 a couple Matilda IIs with max PEN of 7, no APCR, took out bunkers from the side and rear with armor values of 20 for both. In this save the tank at Hex 32,46 has just taken out the one at Hex 39,40. The previous turn its mate (now at Hex 31,44) took out the one at 33,43 from the rear:
Attached Files
File Type: 7z Saved Games.7z (91.3 KB, 171 views)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old February 28th, 2019, 05:09 AM
Imp's Avatar

Imp Imp is offline
General
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
Imp is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AP vs Bunker/Pillboxes

Bunkers are not like vehicles with regard to armour even small arms fire can penetrate and kill those manning it if your lucky.

Not looked at your save but continuous close fire at a bunker normally creates a critical hit pretty quickly.

An experienced crew firing stationary from 1 or 2 hexes have a high probability of a quick kill. Same goes for high experience troops armed with demo or flame so long as you wait for them to be stationary before attacking.
__________________
John
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Imp For This Useful Post:
  #15  
Old February 28th, 2019, 08:03 AM

jivemi jivemi is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 505
Thanks: 432
Thanked 148 Times in 104 Posts
jivemi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AP vs Bunker/Pillboxes

There's no opening at the side or rear. How can AP rounds with max pen of 7 get through 20cm of steel at 4 or 500 meters with one or two shots each? Infantry was not a factor.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old February 28th, 2019, 09:58 AM
Mobhack's Avatar

Mobhack Mobhack is offline
National Security Advisor
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
Mobhack is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AP vs Bunker/Pillboxes

Bunkers are not steel - they are concrete, logs or earthworks considered permeable to fire in the SP universe. Even rifle fire will cause occasional casualties to a maginot line type mega-bunker.

They are really just field works in this game rather than say the sort of WW1 type of deep bunker that could resist a Somme type barrage over weeks. A "SP WW1" Somme bombardment would kill everything in such a fortified line in a game hour or 2.

That is probably done for game play balance - you would have to ask the original SSI team as to why. The same applies to the ease of clearing tactical obstacles like wire and mines, DT etc.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
  #17  
Old February 28th, 2019, 12:30 PM
zovs66's Avatar

zovs66 zovs66 is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 788
Thanks: 1,258
Thanked 576 Times in 313 Posts
zovs66 is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AP vs Bunker/Pillboxes

Think splinters. When those small (or big) rounds hit the side/rear of a concrete, log, brick or whatever bunker, there will be nasty things flying around inside that death hole. The only place I have read about using 'steel' was on Iwo Jima where the Japanese used 'steel' doors to hide their guns behind in caves.

Random stuff happens in this game and I love it. Had a Stug IIIE once get 3 kills in one turn, then could not hit anything the for 5 turns and then got whacked by some hidden Russian AT gun. Great fun stuff!

Also, had a CG I created where the Russians had bunkers, and I shell the crap out of them but it took to long for me to cross the river and when I got across to my surprise they started shooting at me, had to bring the tanks across and shoot them to kill them, took a couple of turns. One was really pesky, had it surrounded by 3 squads and two Pz II's and a Pz III and it finally died after 3 to 4 turns. Had another that took one shot from a 20mm and it got a critical hit. Love the randomness and the realism this game offers!
__________________
ASL
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to zovs66 For This Useful Post:
  #18  
Old February 28th, 2019, 08:05 PM

jivemi jivemi is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Philippines
Posts: 505
Thanks: 432
Thanked 148 Times in 104 Posts
jivemi is on a distinguished road
Default Re: AP vs Bunker/Pillboxes

Thanks for the explications folks. They've convinced me to drop any objections to combat results with bunkers. Carry on and have a great day. Cheers!

Last edited by jivemi; February 28th, 2019 at 09:08 PM..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.