.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > The Camo Workshop > WinSPWW2
Notices


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 12th, 2019, 05:32 PM
ErikCumps's Avatar

ErikCumps ErikCumps is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Leuven, Belgium
Posts: 70
Thanks: 27
Thanked 89 Times in 29 Posts
ErikCumps is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Battle dates: year, month, day, hour?

Quote:
Originally Posted by DRG View Post
It is possible to have more battles than days in a month in a campaign but I would also say it would be very VERY rare that anyone would actually do that.

The simplest solution would be to tell people it won't work if they build a campaign with more than 30 battles a month.... I doubt anyone will complain and for campaigns that do have multiple battles in a month then the first one would be 1..etc etc for "dating" purposes.

SOMEONE will always find a way to push the game beyond the limits then say it's broken. Most though have more reasonable expectations
DRG, thanks, I find your suggestion quite sensible!

This is indeed what I was considering: an automatic battle date day 'assignment',
based on the day of the previous battle in the same month. As long as there are
no more battles in a month than days in that month, warcab does not risk running
out of days to assign...

I suppose it shouldn't be too hard to introduce this in warcab...

The other thing that needs looking into is the battle disambiguation.

This is what is known about each battle:
  • a battle start year and month
  • a battle location string
  • the battle mission strings of the player and the opponent
  • the OOB ID of the opponent

I am hoping that the combination of these elements would be enough to uniquely
identify any of less than 30 battles in a month. Of course, there is no 100% guarantee,
but if the odds are good warcab could indeed only require additional input from the user
when it detects a (then unlikely) battle ambiguity...

So, the question is, is the above a reasonable assumption to make?

Erik

BTW: sorry for all the naive (or stupid/silly/...) questions. I do not have any background
with winSPWW2, so I am not at all aware of what it can do and how it is usually done...


Erik
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.