I'd rather have MM work on AI as opposed to TCP/IP

imperishable · #1 January 11th, 2001, 11:39 AM

I wouldn't suggest getting 5-8 people into an IP game. That's cause once you save the game, you will not open it for several weeks, if not months - that's how hard it is to get everybody back together again. I'm speaking from my experience with Alpha Centauri. If you want 4-20 people, pbem is gonna end up as faster way to play. IP games are best for 1 on 1 playing.

Jubala · #2 January 11th, 2001, 09:54 PM

imperishable, I can't agree with you there. It's all about finding the right crowd to play it. When I was an active AoW player Online I rarely had problems taking up saved games with 6-8 players in them.

phalen · #3 February 15th, 2001, 01:19 PM

quote:
Originally posted by The Puke Empire:
I think very few people will have the time or want to spend their entire weekend multi-play a turn based game. At least I will never try that, even if I do get 10 hours free I wont spend it all on a game (and if I do, my friends don't).

I vote for AI.

(ps, how many turns can u play in 10 hours anyway, 40? probably won't even meet your human adversary ).

if you play a simultanious ... trust me you can easly get lots of people playing. turn based is a little harder.. but still heros of might and magic... 1-7 warloards just to name a fiew others that i can remember playing for over 24 hrs at one setting with around 5 other guys warloards was tcp and helped... specaly cause we could all use our own puter... it could be a BIG asset if done right... or a nightmare if wrong... but it has every chance of making it worth wile... plus what about seIV con (ie quake con) the email option is kinda cool in one respect... but i couldent see spending a year to finsh a game... one turn at a day... and i play a web based game that is real time..

pathfinder · #4 February 15th, 2001, 03:05 PM

having never played a strategy game in multi, I'll defer judgement to you who have. willing to try though if/when implemented.

as for improving the AI... I am in only the second game where I have survived long enough to be in a dead heat for 3d or 4th place. most time I get glassed ...so the AI is bad enough for me

[This message has been edited by pathfinder (edited 15 February 2001).]

Seawolf · #5 February 15th, 2001, 11:27 PM

I'm going to make a few real silly points.

1) Those who want to TCP/IP and can play for hours at a need are younger persons who have lots of free time on their hands. (IMHO)

2) The rest of us don't have hours or money to sit and use up a phone/cable line to play a game.

3) If you can be Online to do TCP why can't you just open up and send out the files via e-mail?

4) not to mention if you do it via e-mail you can play from work with little effort.

------------------
Seawolf on the prowl

Triumvir Emphy · #6 February 15th, 2001, 11:51 PM

Besides, for those who don't want to wait for email because it might be slow, you can always x-fer files through icq/aol/yahoo messenger/etc/etc, or if you are adventurous set up a PPTP tunnel with your buddy and share folders and have a direct write going. You have to wait a few minutes to finish turn anyway, what is 2 seconds to reopen SEIV and start the next turn.

klausD · #7 February 16th, 2001, 12:27 AM

I agree fully with seawolf.
As the game is now there is no really reason for me (old fart) to play it Online or even per pbem.

This would change if MM introduce a scenario generator with its MP-addon. With such a generator we could create short to medium scenarios which could be played in a reasonable time.

If MM does not make such a scenario generator, I fear for a lot of people the Multiplayer addon is not very useful. In this case the time should be rather used for AI-improvement.

bye
Klaus