|
|
|
 |
|

September 10th, 2002, 07:58 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
I used to say I would not build them at all. Ooopsss. Boy was I naive.
I defer from the others in tha;
Early Game:
I buld them first chance I get to grab the early over abundance.
I tend to put them on High Mineral planets while I have an over abundance.
As I go minus I then scrap the ones on High Mineral planets and build Mines.
Later I will build them on smaller low mineral planets / moons.
|

September 10th, 2002, 08:00 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
play porportions, then. you start with alot more storage, and i think there is more realism
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|

September 10th, 2002, 09:33 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
In P&N, each resource producing facility has some storage built into it.
|

September 11th, 2002, 12:37 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Western Canada
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
Quote:
Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
I think Production and maintenance is subtracted from generation.
I know that retrofits are withdrawn straight from storage AFTER production/maintenace, AFTER the storage limits are applied, and BEFORE the generation.
|
I think you may wish to rephrase this, when you say:
a)production/maintenance is subtracted from generation (which implies generation comes first).
b) Retrofits are withdrawn ....AFTER production/maintenance and BEFORE the generation.
In any event, are you trying to say (in order of sequence):
1) new storage limits are increased (ie new storage facilities constructed)
2) retrofits are paid out of storage
3) the net of production/maintenance and production is added or subtracted to storage.
Just a bit confused... 
__________________
Know thyself.
Inscription at the Delphic Oracle.
Plutarch Morals
circa 650 B.C.
|

September 12th, 2002, 02:08 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
The best place to put Storage Facilities is in a system that doesn't contain a Space Port. Doesn't sounds realistic but it works.
I also build enough Storage Facility to hold 1/4 Millian of all resources, for when I need them in the late game.
|

September 12th, 2002, 02:22 AM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: California
Posts: 26
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
Ships are Mothballed in space. No storage used.
Any player who has never run low on resources isn't playing a decent human opponent. A minimal investment in 20 or so storage facilities over the first 30 - 40 turns captures early revenue which will prevent a critical shortage late in the game when suddenly there is a need to spend 250,000 KT of minerals to replace that destroyed fleet.
Save for the future. Always.
BTW, for most races I find a ratio of 4 mineral/2 radioactive/1 organic storage facilies to be effective.
__________________
===================================
Someday I'll tell my friends about this forum... Naaaah.
===================================
|

September 12th, 2002, 04:02 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
Quote:
Originally posted by Baron Grazic:
The best place to put Storage Facilities is in a system that doesn't contain a Space Port. Doesn't sounds realistic but it works.
I also build enough Storage Facility to hold 1/4 Millian of all resources, for when I need them in the late game.
|
It's best NOT to concentrate your storage in any one place, though. What if the star in that system with all your storage goes nova? Oops... Similarly, if a large planet full of storage facilities has the 'unstable core' event, or just gets attacked and destroyed/captured by an enemy, it's a major blow. Best to put a few storage facilities on many large/huge planets scattered around. I tend to put them on Military Installations because those are low resource value planets anyway.
|

September 12th, 2002, 04:10 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Australia
Posts: 809
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
I didn't mean to say that this the only place I create Storage Facilities. I find it is best to colonise say 3 planets in a new system at a time, have 2 planets build Storage facilities, while the third is building the Space Port, and then build what even is needed.
I know someone will say that its better to build a SY or Minerals Facility, etc during this time, but everyone has their own styles - That is why PBW is so much fun.
[ September 12, 2002, 03:10: Message edited by: Baron Grazic ]
|

September 12th, 2002, 05:33 AM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Biddeford, ME, USA
Posts: 1,007
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
Quote:
Originally posted by Suicide Junkie:
....I know that retrofits are withdrawn straight from storage AFTER production/maintenace, AFTER the storage limits are applied, and BEFORE the generation.
|
Is that correct? I thought for sure that funds are drawn instantly at the time of retrofit??? If you don't have enough on hand, the retrofit don't happen....IIRC...
|

September 12th, 2002, 08:12 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Storage facilities
You're describing turn-based mode. He was describing simultaneous mode.
PvK
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|