Space Empires 2 and warp point defense

[Ragnarok]

Yeah, I wish the AI acted like it did in SE2. With the WP defense it had back then. Not only did they sit like ALOT of dreads on the WPs but they also built like ALOT more starbases. You would seriously have to have a fleet of 100 ships or more to punch your way through. And that figure is only if there were like 80 total ships on the WP. If they had 150 (I've seen it done) on the WP you'd have to have close to 200 ships be able to win. It was great, and it'd be awesome if someone could make it like that in SEIV.

[Mephisto]

Unfortunately, in SE4 there is no way to teach the Ai to defend warp points with fleets.

[Rollo]

Yeah, not with modding. But Aaron could teach them. The AI is supposed to use some percentage of its fleets for defense. These fleets could guard warp points between 'secure' systems and contested systems or try to cut of enemy reinforcements to contested systems. This would be a step towards a better strategic behavoir of the AI.

Rollo

[DirectorTsaarx]

Originally posted by Rollo:
Yeah, not with modding. But Aaron could teach them. The AI is supposed to use some percentage of its fleets for defense. These fleets could guard warp points between 'secure' systems and contested systems or try to cut of enemy reinforcements to contested systems. This would be a step towards a better strategic behavoir of the AI.

Rollo

Makes you wonder if Aaron specifically chose not to set the AI up to defend warp points in SE4. Maybe it was an issue of balancing planetary defense and warp point defense.

I'd also like to see the AI build bases in "uninhabited" systems, i.e. build bases in asteroid field systems, nebulas, etc. As long as it knew enough not to build in a black hole system But the AI has never been good at that, not even in SE2 or SE3 (at least not that I recall).

[Mylon]

Am I the only one that sees guarding warp points a little silly? I can understand in the early game, but what good is a fleet of 20 starbases sitting on a warp point when another one opens somewhere else? I'd much rather park those starbases over my planets. Sure, it's riskier because enough suicide ships can rush the planet and blow it up, but at least they help to some extent.

That, and the maintenance cost for starbases seems awfully high, even with the 50% reduction. Each battlestation practically requires a tiny planet just to provide the maintenance.

[Arkcon]

Originally posted by Mylon:
Am I the only one that sees guarding warp points a little silly?

I did that once, traded with the neutrals so I could get it fast. It worked remarkably well. Half a dozen battlestations and starbases. Some fighter platforms, null space cannons, massive mount ripper beams. Really kept the Pyrochette at bay for a good long time. Built myself a nice little empire.

Nice, quiet, safe little womb -- rhymes with tomb. The Pyrochette lost fleet after fleet at my choke points -- while they sliced up the rest of the galaxy. They may have been the first TDM modpack race to use Stellar manipulation, cause there were NO PLANETS that weren't theirs -- just asteroids. When everyone else was dead, they broke my defences.

Coulda made that a shorter post -- walling yourself in is ultimately self defeating against the AI. And probably just plain dumb vs humans.

[Phoenix-D]

"Am I the only one that sees guarding warp points a little silly? I can understand in the early game, but what good is a fleet of 20 starbases sitting on a warp point when another one opens somewhere else? I'd much rather park those starbases over my planets."

System shield. Guarding WPs lets you concentrate your forces, where protecting each planet individually invites defeat in detail.

Phoenix-D