|
|
|
 |

October 10th, 2002, 07:29 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: SE Pennsylvania
Posts: 722
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: About Space Elevators
What I want to know is how they are going to ground the darn thing. Electricly. Isn't there an electrical charge difference between earth's surface and high altitude? Sounds to me like this would be the Mother of all Lightning Rods!
Who needs terrorists when NATURE itself will take care of the problem. 
__________________
Gaze upon Taz-in-Space and TREMBLE!
<img src=http://imagemodserver.mine.nu/other/MM/SE4/warning_labels/inuse/taz.jpg alt= - /]
WARNING: Always count fingers after feeding the Tazmanian Devil!
|

October 10th, 2002, 08:13 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: About Space Elevators
Just being that tall would make it the mother of all lightning rods, to say nothing of all the interesting effects it might have on global weather (and vice versa).
However, planes can take direct hits from lightning and keep going; if the car is on the outside, or cleared before a storm, I don't think a hit would do THAT much.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|

October 10th, 2002, 09:12 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: About Space Elevators
Quote:
I can imagine a little (huge) oceanic platform where cargo liners (and maybe cruise ships) come to load and unload cargo,
|
Heh, that's a good point. HOw to get stuff to/ from the floating platform? Boats, sure, but boats are slow. It would be quite ironic if something this high tech revitalised some older technologies like flying boats & airships.
|

October 10th, 2002, 11:19 AM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 17
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: About Space Elevators
Good point about the lightning, Taz.
MAybe they yould even use this power that comes down the cable, it just has to be strong enough. Thus you would not need to "ground" it, you channel the current into your battery.
|

October 10th, 2002, 11:33 AM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: iola, ks, usa
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: About Space Elevators
D of the V: Man, that's one honkin battery your talking about!!! Do they even make batteries with that kind of capacity? CAN they even make batteries with that kind of capacity???? 
|

October 10th, 2002, 12:37 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: About Space Elevators
Quote:
MAybe they yould even use this power that comes down the cable, it just has to be strong enough. Thus you would not need to "ground" it, you channel the current into your battery.
|
Well, if memory serves me correctly, according to Dr Emmet Brown ot the Back to the Future series, a lightening strike supplies exactly 1.21 jiggerwatts of electricity, which happens to be the exact amount needed to send a sports car into the past. So you could actually go up the cable in Australia at 9 in the morning and come down in Europe at midday in 1955.
Seriously, I should think the cable would actually do away with lightning in the area altogether... As I understand it, lightning is when static electricity builds up at cloud level to such an extent that it has to find the route of least resistance to the ground.
With a permanent link between the ground and all levels of the atmosphere, (and I'm not sure but I think bucky carbon would be a pretty good conductor) surely the static would be constantly conducting itself to ground and so there would never be enough built up to form an arc (lightening). Ummm...
You can tell I haven't studied science in 10 years!
|

October 10th, 2002, 05:03 PM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Toledo, OH
Posts: 641
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: About Space Elevators
Quote:
the static would be constantly conducting itself to ground
|
Even better for powering the thing if you have a constant current.
__________________
Assume you have a 1kg squirrel
E=mc^2
E=1kg(3x10^8m/s)^2=9x10^16J
which, if I'm not mistaken, is equivilent to roughly a 50 megaton nuclear bomb.
Fear the squirrel.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|