When to attack

[Fyron]

Ok... that is what I was thinking The Prince was.

[Taera]

Does someone have a link to full translation of Sun Tzu's book and Prince, too? I have one Sun Tzu's translation but its rather puny...

[Fyron]

I used to have a link to Sun Tsu's book. I think I got that link from the old EZ Board Hypercomm Central.

[Arkcon]

Originally posted by Taera:
Does someone have a link to full translation of Sun Tzu's book and Prince, too? I have one Sun Tzu's translation but its rather puny...

Well, for The Prince, I have this link to project Gutenberg

I used to have one with side-by-side english and italian. But I lost that link. If anyone finds one please pass it along.

A good, complete, Online Version of Art of War would be nice. I'll do fine without a Chinese Version.

[Arkcon]

Originally posted by Zoompet:

quote:

---

Originally posted by Puke:
Sun Tzu and The Prince both have direct applications in SE4. I tend to favor the latter over the former.

Which one said "don't attack until you can sweep 100 points of mines."

---

Neither, Machiavelli said your ships should already be at the enemys resupply depot before you broke your military alliance.

Sun-tzu said to activate the warp point opener -- into a non-colonized system in enemy territory behind the lines.

Look it up, it's in there, just translated poorly.



[ October 11, 2002, 14:17: Message edited by: Arkcon ]

[Zoompet]

Hmmm, this is getting a little far a field.

I guess what I was driving is which is better an early, middle or late game attack. Why, do people think they need a certain tech item, an economy of X size, a fleet of Y size, etc.

This is in particular reference to human players.

[Stone Mill]

This may not directly answer you question, but experienced players are on target when they apply real-world principles to SEIV.

From my military training, I find these invaluable:

PRINCIPLES OR WAR
Objective
Direct military operations toward a defined and attainable objective that contributes to strategic, operational, or tactical aims.
Offensive
Dictates that we act rather than react and dictate the time, place, purpose, scope, intensity, and pace of operations. The initiative must be seized, retained, and fully exploited.
Mass
Concentrate combat power at the decisive time and place.
Economy of Force
Create usable mass by using minimum combat power on secondary objectives. Make the fullest use of forces available
Maneuver
Place the enemy in a position of disadvantage through flexible application of combat power.
Unity of Command
Ensure unity of effort for every objective under one responsible commander.
Security
Protect friendly forces and their operations from enemy actions, which could provide the enemy with unexpected advantage.
Surprise
Strike the enemy at a time or place or in a manner for which he is unprepared.
Simplicity
Avoid unnecessary complexity in preparing, planning, and conducting military operations.

Now as for specific applications of these principles... that may be a few more Posts.