|
|
|
|
 |
October 19th, 2002, 09:49 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Kiel, Germany
Posts: 1,896
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Ram can be very powerful. The best ram utility IMO is organic armor. (sorry, couldn't resist)  |
October 19th, 2002, 12:16 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Quote:
Originally posted by Gandalph:
The absolutely best RAM utility is MORE RAM!!
|
Especially if you consider the low price for it at the moment.
I installed for about 100 US $ 256MB RAM into my old PII 233MHz with 32 MB RAM originally. It is almost as I have a new computer. |
October 19th, 2002, 08:33 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
RAM was cheaper than that Last year, actually. |
October 19th, 2002, 09:12 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Overland Park, Kansas
Posts: 209
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Thanks for the advice. I'm still using Windows95 for my OS. I know it's old, but not succeptible to most of the current viruses.
Greybeard
|
October 19th, 2002, 10:40 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 1,237
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Ragnarok: Thanks for the help. Guess I'm just getting old!
And, Thank You Rollo!
Q: Wheew, glad I don't live in Europe. 512MB's RAM here, going for about $40.00.
Used 95 for a long time. It is alot more stable than most of the new OS's. Now running 98SE. Pretty good!!  |
October 19th, 2002, 10:42 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Quote:
Originally posted by mlmbd:
Used 95 for a long time. It is alot more stable than most of the new OS's. Now running 98SE. Pretty good!!
|
Uhh... no. Win95 is one of the least stable OS out there (besides WinME, anyways ). Win2000 and WinXP are very stable OS that normally do not crash. |
October 19th, 2002, 11:06 PM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Uranus
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT - RAM utilities -> XP sucks? -> ME is worse?
Some other products: winROCKET and RAMrocket at Ascentive.com. You might find these of use.
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
