|
|
|
|
 |
November 4th, 2002, 07:30 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 4,603
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
. Fixed - Improved the Transport minister a little...
What ??
did it go from a horrible status to a half-A%% position ??
Please explain!
__________________
RRRRRRRRRRAAAAAGGGGGGGGGHHHHH
old avatar = http://www.shrapnelgames.com/cgi-bin...1051567998.jpg
Hey GUTB where did you go...???
He is still driving his mighty armada at 3 miles per month along the interstellar highway bypass and will be arriving shortly
|
November 4th, 2002, 08:10 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,661
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
"7. Added - The Log Window will now return you to the item you had selected the
Last time you were in the window."
This is excellent!
If the same could be done for other large lists like construction, ship, colonies list it would make things a lot easier in large/late games.
|
November 4th, 2002, 08:10 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Va
Posts: 32
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
Originally posted by DavidG:
quote:
Originally posted by Will:
Some comments....
quote:
Facility that adds facility space to a planet
|
You DO realize how unbalancing/unrealistic this is, correct? Maybe if there is a one per planet restriction...
Actaully never thought about it before since this was someone elses idea. However I would think this could work if it was like Atmospheric Converter. After say a year you get 25% more facilities.
This would not be needed as much, if all the facility abilities could also be used by bases, like research and intel. 
__________________
Am I real because I think I'm [i]REAL</i] or Because U think I'm[i] REAL</i]
SE4 Code: L- GdQ $ Fr! T? Sf* Tcp! A%% M-- Mp* RY Pw Fq++ Nd- Rp* G+++ AuO Mm++
|
November 4th, 2002, 09:59 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 947
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
Originally posted by [K126]Mephisto:
Latest patch infos:
|
How about how soon we may see this patch. The TDB bug is wreaking havoc in several games.
[ November 04, 2002, 19:59: Message edited by: Gandalph ]
__________________
All that is gold does not glitter,
Not all those who wander are lost;
The old that is strong does not wither,
Deep roots are not reached by the frost.
|
November 4th, 2002, 10:03 PM
|
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Bah. I want racial trait restrictions and requirements, and planetary drives 
-Paladin |
November 4th, 2002, 11:58 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Northern Virginia, USA
Posts: 1,048
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
Quote:
Originally posted by [K126]Mephisto:
Latest patch infos:
Version 1.82:
1. Changed - Ships in combat will now follow their fleet's strategy regardless of whether they are in a combat group or not.
|
Ummmm... does this mean unarmed ships/carriers/etc. will no longer run to the corners if they're part of a fleet that has a strategy of "[Optimum/point-blank/max/etc.] weapons range" or any of the other combat-oriented strategies? I can see that it might make planet invasions easier, and get rid of the "bug" that ships with only PDC will run from battle, but I'd like my supply and repair ships to stay away from the enemy ships...
__________________
L++ Se+++ GdY $++ Fr C+++ Csc Sf Ai AuO M+ MpTM S Ss RRSHP+ Pw- Fq->Fq+ Nd+++ Rp G++ Mm++ Bb---
|
November 5th, 2002, 01:53 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: POLL->things we\'d really like in Next Patch (Platinum II)
If a warship on optimum range orders loses all its weapons, it will run for the corners.
So a ship that starts with no weapons will run for it too.
__________________
Things you want:
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
Asteroids Champion!
