|
|
|
 |

November 11th, 2002, 11:41 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Whos on first when it comes to firing?
I asked the wrong question.
How do we, (if we can), control which element firers first?
Is it related to the order of deployment?
If I deploy the sats, then enter with my ships will the sats fire first?
|

November 11th, 2002, 11:44 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: Whos on first when it comes to firing?
Umm... the first built object _might_ be the one that fires first, but I do not really know.
|

November 11th, 2002, 11:48 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: Whos on first when it comes to firing?
I think your ships always move and fire first, then your sats and planets with weapons platforms fire, and finally your fighters and drones move and fire Last.
I'm not sure about any of that, though; I don't see many combats with all the types together on one side.
[ November 11, 2002, 21:49: Message edited by: capnq ]
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|

November 12th, 2002, 04:22 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Whos on first when it comes to firing?
I'll test and see what fires up first.
Still, if it turns out that ships get in the first licks, am I the only one that would like it changed?
|

November 12th, 2002, 12:44 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Whos on first when it comes to firing?
Maybe... Having ships go first could be a good thing, since they can gain experience and units cannot.
I think if a change were to to be made the only satidfactory one would be some system where the player defines the order (maybe a bit like repair priorities?), but that has the potential to be nightmarishly complicated and I don't think it's likely to get implemented.
|

November 13th, 2002, 02:56 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Near Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 2,471
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Whos on first when it comes to firing?
Ships can't gain experiance if they get blown out of the sky buy talisman toting BCs. I'm guessing the 3 ships that could have been destroyed by my sats cost me 1 or 2 BCs.
|

November 12th, 2002, 04:49 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Whos on first when it comes to firing?
Perhaps short-ranged weapons should fire before long-ranged ones...
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|