|
|
|
|
 |

November 28th, 2002, 01:54 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: thinking: OA vs CA
SJ: high damage/low reload weapons eliminate any bonuses from regeneration and whatsoever so thats not that much important.
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|

November 28th, 2002, 04:35 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: thinking: OA vs CA
High-damage low reload weapons will give your OA time to regenerate while they reload.
The CA just sits idly by waiting for the next hit.
__________________
Things you want:
|

November 28th, 2002, 09:10 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: thinking: OA vs CA
My most liked advanced tech was organic armor but
after the new patch is released, OA will loose its power. Who needs regenerating armor if it regenerates only AFTER the battle? I don't see the point in that. If the ship survives the battle - there are repair bays/space yards to repair it.
Crystaline armor is nice but to spend 1500 points on armor that is just a little better than normal is way too much. I would beef-up research/construction for that amount of points and just put more normal armor/shields on a ship.
|

November 28th, 2002, 11:18 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: thinking: OA vs CA
Quote:
|
after the new patch is released, OA will loose its power. Who needs regenerating armor if it regenerates only AFTER the battle? I don't see the point in that. If the ship survives the battle - there are repair bays/space yards to repair it.
|
I don't think that's how it's going to work. OA will still regenerqate during combat as usual, but it will also regenerate after combat, which it didn't do before.
|

November 29th, 2002, 02:48 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 290
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: thinking: OA vs CA
Right, dogscoff. I searched through the forum and found that OA will not PRE-regenerate.
Thanks for making such a simple statement and my life happier
[ November 28, 2002, 12:49: Message edited by: Pablo ]
|

November 28th, 2002, 04:21 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Oxford, UK
Posts: 2,592
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: thinking: OA vs CA
CA requires phased shields - PPB makes CA ability irrelevant if your ship has just normal shields.
__________________
It is forbidden to kill; therefore all murderers are punished unless they kill in large numbers and to the sound of trumpets. - Voltaire
|

November 30th, 2002, 01:24 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Calgary, AB, Canada
Posts: 1,743
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: thinking: OA vs CA
crystallurgy tech tree.
Dont forget that the crystallurgy has the Energy Dampener, which is not to be ignored, and the High-Energy Magnifier, which is though being high in the technology tree and research-costly is one of the best weapons in the game IMO.
edit: oleg, thats a good point. once again though, rock-scissor-paper. CA is more useful against most other weapons.
[ November 29, 2002, 23:25: Message edited by: Taera ]
__________________
Let the game begin!
Green bug from outa space!
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|