Anomaly reports

[DRG]

Originally Posted by Pibwl

Sorry - most Gvozdikas in oobs that I've examined in detail already had AAMG, so I thought it was a common mistake. Anyway, I thought, that this is the thread for mass anomalies through oobs, so it's a good place to report this one. There is AAMG in Polish, Czech, Hungarian, Libyan, East German (SFL M-1974), Yugoslavian and maybe also other oobs.

I didn't refer to Fatima-1 at all.

Regards,
Michal

Richard referred to it and I first checked the country of origin and it didn't have one so rather than make more work than I need I thought it best to point out that to get things fixed I need clear information

Don

[DRG]

Didn't get it.....

Don


OK Got it now..........

[DRG]

Noted, I'm way busy ATM but will get back to you later on this. For now just ingore that

Don

[Richard_H]

Understood, I don't even feel like tackling it myself yet. You'll be pleased to hear that the tanks report is mercifully short . . .

Class 12 – Light Tank

Switzerland 25 & 920-922 and Finland 370-372 have Load Cost less than 10.


Class 103 – Medium Tank

Lebanon 555 has no ammunition for Weapon 4.


Class 106 – CS Infantry Tank

USMC 461 & 462 have the 120mm gun in Weapon slot 2 as well as in slot 1.


Class 131 – Cavalry Tank

China 501 has RoF 7, standard is 9.


Class 175 – Airborne Light Tank

W.Germany 62 & 96 have RoF 9, standard is 4.

And that concludes what I hope has been a worthwhile exercise. One of these days I'll do the same for WW2 - but not yet!

Richard H

[DRG]

Originally Posted by Richard_H

Understood, I don't even feel like tackling it myself yet. Richard H

No need to.

The survivabilty number is NOT used by the game for aircraft or helos and therefore does not factor into a units cost as calculated by the cost calculator. Over time those numbers have been added in by various OOB writers as a matter of habit but they have no more effect on the game than would if a survival factor was added to infantry. The game simply does not read it.

The only reason they have not been cleaned out before now is there are AT LEAST 3000 units are affected but we now have a development utility that can do mass changes like this ( same one that dealt with the hand grenade issue ) and this will be done for both games.

Originally Posted by Richard_H

You'll be pleased to hear that the tanks report is mercifully short . . .

Originally Posted by Richard_H

And that concludes what I hope has been a worthwhile exercise. One of these days I'll do the same for WW2 - but not yet!

Richard H

[Suhiir]

Originally Posted by DRG

The survivability number is NOTused by the game for aircraft or helos and therefore does not factor into a units cost as calculated by the cost calculator. Over time those numbers have been added in by various OOB writers as a matter of habit but they have no more effect on the game than would if a survival factor was added to infantry. The game simply does not read it.

I know survivability is not used for aircraft, but I want to confirm it is also ignored for helos????

[DRG]

That's right. They don't spit out crews when they crash so no helos either

Don

[Suhiir]

Originally Posted by DRG

That's right. They don't spit out crews when they crash so no helos either

Don

Kewl, I thought survivability had some effect on the resistance to damage of helos much like it effects tanks.

**Goes into her OOB revision and changes all the ratings to zero**

[FASTBOAT TOUGH]

Richard H
A "yeomans work" well done I think! And for Don maybe I'll send up a case of "Buud" I'm sure he's tired of that "stuff" North of the Border!?! Then again maybe...not.

Regards,
Pat

[Suhiir]

Originally Posted by FASTBOAT TOUGH

Richard H
A "yeomans work" well done I think! And for Don maybe I'll send up a case of "Buud" I'm sure he's tired of that "stuff" North of the Border!?! Then again maybe...not.

Regards,
Pat

Make his day, get him some Oettinger Bier.