|
|
|
|
|
January 31st, 2008, 11:47 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 60
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vanheim
Wokeye, do you mean Cealum instead of Vanheim?
|
February 1st, 2008, 12:01 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 410
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Vanheim
As stated, Vanheim has attacked Abysia this turn.
EDIT: I have had my correspondence minister review notes on our diplomatic discussions and would like to withdraw my previous statement regarding a NAP with Vanheim. It was discusses, but never formally agreed to.
Nevertheless, we do not appreciate the visiting vanheim raiders. Their mirror imaging confuses our citizens.
|
February 1st, 2008, 12:23 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 60
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vanheim
Well, Vanheim is like a tricky fox. When we are fighting TC/Niefel they stay away like a peace lover. Now we have almost done then they come and want some free cakes? No neighbour can be more dangerous than them...except Cealum...
To Cealum:
Attacking us before terminate the NAP is just beyond belief. Any explanation?
To Vanheim:
We pay and we gain. Anyone wants to disturb our harvest will be punished. And, congratulation, you have NAP with Cealum. Hopefully they can tell Vanheim from Lanka...We are both in red and they never care about NAPs...
|
February 1st, 2008, 01:36 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vanheim
Interesting stuff....hope my NAP with Caelum is worth the paper its printed on. Of course I find it easier to enforce NAPs when you are not bordering the nation that you have them with.
I returned your email wokeye.
|
February 1st, 2008, 03:01 AM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 410
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Vanheim
Map borders don't mean much with all those portals
|
February 1st, 2008, 11:55 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vanheim
That's true...my back is never safe. Not too many armies moving in the portals, unless they are sneaking past my scouts, which is possible.
|
February 1st, 2008, 08:56 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Denmark
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vanheim
I'm sorry about that, I was quite certain that I cancelled the NAP in turn 17 to Lanka, I will ofc not attack any further for the next 2 rounds then..
I apologise for the attack
|
February 1st, 2008, 10:32 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Vanheim
Any reason why the server still shows its waiting for TC's turn?
|
February 2nd, 2008, 05:02 AM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 336
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Agouti (Noob Team Game) Looking For Players
eh, holidays?
|
February 2nd, 2008, 09:52 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 90
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Agouti (Noob Team Game) Looking For Players
Now it has removed TC from the list of players, so everything should be ok.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|