|
|
|
|
|
July 14th, 2008, 09:40 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Quote:
K said:
Actually, that's wrong.
Logical arguments are supported by evidence, and thus the weight of the evidence determines who wins.
|
[raises eyebrows]
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|
July 14th, 2008, 09:55 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Riiiiight.
I haven't taken part in this thread. I just want to state for the record that K is apparently taking that I consier MoD + retreat even without any other spells to inflict damage to be an exploit and a 'lame' tactic and I have no interest in playing against someone who uses it.
|
July 14th, 2008, 10:02 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Quote:
Sombre said:
Riiiiight.
I haven't taken part in this thread. I just want to state for the record that K is apparently taking that I consier MoD + retreat even without any other spells to inflict damage to be an exploit and a 'lame' tactic and I have no interest in playing against someone who uses it.
|
Then play in a game that explicitly has rules against it. There are seven out of 37 playing now, so you won't be alone. You are just in the minority.
Heck, I might even join you. I follow all rules set by the admin. For the record, I've never taken the position that people should violate agreements.
I just advise you to take a little responsibility and don't expect people to read your mind about what you consider "lame."
|
July 14th, 2008, 10:15 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Lame is a term I can accept. Which I would still consider different than cheat.
I recommend that games specify at the beginning what can and cannot be done. Even if its to refer to something such as "nothing in Red in Edi's buglist"
Some games such as Velusians used a MOD to make somethings unusable. Would it be bettr to take MoD completely out of a game?
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
July 14th, 2008, 10:21 PM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Well at least 1 out of the 30 w/o explicit rules against it (Alexandria) had implict rules against it, which we have just made explicit.
We confirmed that we were all playing under the assumption that MoD - retreat was an abusive tactic and not in the spirit of the game.
In the future it probably makes sense to clarify up front as you never know who is in the game.
Ironically, check Figment, looks like MoD just got banned there too.
K, you're data set is shrinking!!!
__________________
i crossed blades with the mightiest warriors of the golden age. i witnessed with sorrow the schism that led to the passing of legends. now my sword hangs in its scabbard, with nothing but memories to keep it warm.
|
July 14th, 2008, 10:35 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Vacaville, CA, USA
Posts: 13,736
Thanks: 341
Thanked 479 Times in 326 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Figment is what I asked.
It has a MOD in place and I think that a change can be made to it to remove MoD from the game and still allow the game to continue
__________________
-- DISCLAIMER:
This game is NOT suitable for students, interns, apprentices, or anyone else who is expected to pass tests on a regular basis. Do not think about strategies while operating heavy machinery. Before beginning this game make arrangements for someone to check on you daily. If you find that your game has continued for more than 36 hours straight then you should consult a physician immediately (Do NOT show him the game!)
|
July 14th, 2008, 10:43 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Quote:
K said:
Then play in a game that explicitly has rules against it. There are seven out of 37 playing now, so you won't be alone. You are just in the minority.
Heck, I might even join you. I follow all rules set by the admin. For the record, I've never taken the position that people should violate agreements.
I just advise you to take a little responsibility and don't expect people to read your mind about what you consider "lame."
|
I don't remember asking for your advice. I probably won't be playing any games with you K, just based on the way you've acted in several threads I've read. It could happen we're in the same game though, where I'm sure we'd both follow the rules.
|
July 14th, 2008, 11:16 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Quote:
DonCorazon said:
Well at least 1 out of the 30 w/o explicit rules against it (Alexandria) had implict rules against it, which we have just made explicit.
We confirmed that we were all playing under the assumption that MoD - retreat was an abusive tactic and not in the spirit of the game.
In the future it probably makes sense to clarify up front as you never know who is in the game.
Ironically, check Figment, looks like MoD just got banned there too.
K, you're data set is shrinking!!!
|
And I think that's great. I'm sure that it's going to keep a lot of problems out of your game.
Now we're up to 9 out 37.
|
July 14th, 2008, 11:29 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 773
Thanks: 2
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Quote:
Sombre said:
Quote:
K said:
Then play in a game that explicitly has rules against it. There are seven out of 37 playing now, so you won't be alone. You are just in the minority.
Heck, I might even join you. I follow all rules set by the admin. For the record, I've never taken the position that people should violate agreements.
I just advise you to take a little responsibility and don't expect people to read your mind about what you consider "lame."
|
I don't remember asking for your advice. I probably won't be playing any games with you K, just based on the way you've acted in several threads I've read. It could happen we're in the same game though, where I'm sure we'd both follow the rules.
|
Willing or not, you've all been part of my personal crusade to clarify this issue and make MP less contentious by having explicit rules (either pro or con is fine for me).
Considering how quickly and completely I've been personally attacked and demonized, I can now understand why no one has really been willing to draw out the relevant issue. I'll probably have to create a new account just to get people to play in MP with me again.
I'm actually really happy that several games have added these rules as explicit rules in their game as a result of this thread. It means that sacrificing my DomIII reputation was worth the effort.
|
July 15th, 2008, 12:08 AM
|
|
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Bakersfield CA USA
Posts: 1,524
Thanks: 7
Thanked 15 Times in 13 Posts
|
|
Re: Battlefield spell + retreating?
Having multiple accounts is not acceptable. The Board rules are very clear about this.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|