.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $5.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Illwinter Game Design > Dominions 2: The Ascension Wars

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 7th, 2005, 04:30 PM
Shmonk's Avatar

Shmonk Shmonk is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 436
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Shmonk is on a distinguished road
Default Re: displel chance

That's the "joy" of casting Dispel, it would seem (my first time casting it in a game, results later today). You start asking yourself, how much did he put into that global initially, just the base gem cost, or some extra gems. And if so, how many extra gems should I "waste" to ensure it gets dispelled.

At least that's how I see it.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old July 7th, 2005, 04:58 PM
WraithLord's Avatar

WraithLord WraithLord is offline
General
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
WraithLord is on a distinguished road
Default Re: displel chance

Quote:
FrankTrollman said:
I have never seen a dispel cast with more TOTAL gams than the original spell fail. I have never seen a dispel cst with less TOTAL gems than the original spell succeed.

This leads me to believe that there is no open ended die roll involved, and that the bigger spell simply wins. Every time.

Note, the spell doesn't seem to care about how many extra gems are spent, only how many total gems are spent. So a Burden of Time with zero extra gems would need 41+ extra gems to dispel (because a base Burden of Time has 70 gems in it, and the base Dispel has only 30 astral Pearls in it).

Note2, it looks like it's the total gems you actually spent, so if you have been casting spells out of a magic bonus site, it's that much cheaper to dispel them as well.

Note3, this is probably why the minimum Dispel is 30 pearls, as that is coincidentally the minimum cost of any Global Enchantment (Stellar Brilliance, as it happens).

-Frank
Wow, If that is accurate it really makes dispel quite weak.
I wonder how come it's not in the manual or something.
A confirmation from the Devs would help a lot.
@Truper, can you tell us where did you get this information regarding dispel chance?- Does it agree with your experience?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old July 7th, 2005, 05:23 PM
WraithLord's Avatar

WraithLord WraithLord is offline
General
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
WraithLord is on a distinguished road
Default Re: displel chance

There is an explanation oed6 math in Sunray's site.
For some reason though I can read the whole document but when it get's to the part of giving the formula (p(n)= ...) it is left blank. Maybe it's a problem with open office...

Also I found some interesting discussion in the old ibm strategy forums.
It looks like it's about dominions PPP. It also seems to back Truper's explanation.

I admit I'm completely puzzled here.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old July 7th, 2005, 05:56 PM

Turin Turin is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 483
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Turin is on a distinguished road
Default Re: displel chance

Quote:
FrankTrollman said:
I have never seen a dispel cast with more TOTAL gams than the original spell fail. I have never seen a dispel cst with less TOTAL gems than the original spell succeed.

This leads me to believe that there is no open ended die roll involved, and that the bigger spell simply wins. Every time.

Note, the spell doesn't seem to care about how many extra gems are spent, only how many total gems are spent. So a Burden of Time with zero extra gems would need 41+ extra gems to dispel (because a base Burden of Time has 70 gems in it, and the base Dispel has only 30 astral Pearls in it).

Note2, it looks like it's the total gems you actually spent, so if you have been casting spells out of a magic bonus site, it's that much cheaper to dispel them as well.

Note3, this is probably why the minimum Dispel is 30 pearls, as that is coincidentally the minimum cost of any Global Enchantment (Stellar Brilliance, as it happens).

-Frank
this is wrong, I just tested it in sp. First I cast a well of misery(80 total gems) , then I dispelled it with a 20gem powered dispel.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old July 7th, 2005, 06:35 PM
WraithLord's Avatar

WraithLord WraithLord is offline
General
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
WraithLord is on a distinguished road
Default Re: displel chance

Quote:
Turin said:
this is wrong, I just tested it in sp. First I cast a well of misery(80 total gems) , then I dispelled it with a 20gem powered dispel.
Yes! I was somewhat disappointed with dispel in light of FrankTrollman's explanation.
Thank You Turin for testing this.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old July 12th, 2005, 02:38 AM

alexti alexti is offline
First Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Calgary, Canada
Posts: 762
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alexti is on a distinguished road
Default Re: displel chance

I remember testing it. The global enhancement strength is equal to a number of extra gems put in the spell + number of extra level (above required) of the caster. I haven't identified any random element, but that's a random element - one is not guaranteed to detect it by a serie of experiments I'm sure that if there's a random element, it is not large, so dispel with 969 extra gems by a decent astral mage dispels pretty much anything worth dispelling
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old July 12th, 2005, 07:17 AM
WraithLord's Avatar

WraithLord WraithLord is offline
General
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
WraithLord is on a distinguished road
Default Re: displel chance

how about an idea for a detection spell that tells the caster the strength of a global enchantment.

It can be used with dispel to optimize the dispelling chance vs astral gems spent ratio.
It can be a level 9 spell with high astral requirements (say astral 6) and low gem requirement (say 10 astral).
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2025, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.