Quote:
Possum said:
Most organised charities pass less than 50% of the money they collect on to the intended recipients, with the rest eaten up by huge salaries for top administrators, while most of the buttwork is done by unpaid volunteers. And if you think that sounds bad, remember that some charities pass only 10% of donations along to the needy, with 90% eaten up by huge salaries for their top administrators.
These days, I live by the adage that "charity begins at home".
|
Yeah, you´re right, the only charity you can be sure to reach the intended persons is the one you do yourself... One of the supposed "charities" that makes me angriest is the ones organized by "evangelic churches" here in Brazil, where the majority of the money (if no all) ends with the "church" and not with the poor people that needs it...
And the worse is that the heads of these "churchs" flaunt openly that they are rich, using expensive limos, small jets, living in mansions, where the poor that needed the money only get worse...
BTW: i put "evangelic churches" in quotes to differentiate the ones i´m talking about from the real and proper evangelic churches that, while smaller in number than the fake ones, are very respectable institutions and do several community services...
but not every charity is "rigged" like the ones told here, i particulary find nice the charities done by the freemasons, where members of the "lodge" contribute to a "pot" every session and at the end of a certain period (normally six months), a needy family is chosen and, at night, a member of the lodge puts the money at the door of the family (or someplace where the head of the family will easily find) and
leave without revealing to the persons that received who left the money, (they normally only leave a note, whitout signature, saying that the money is to help the family in these hard times)
It´s gestures like these that makes me have still some hope in humanity... even if 90% of the other "charities" are not...