|
|
|
|
|
July 21st, 2007, 03:28 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
TC can also make Jade Armor, and Sword of Swiftness is another good weapon. Frozen Heart. Sprinkling single water gems on a bunch of W1 mages for a sudden Summon Water Elemental tidal wave...
|
July 21st, 2007, 03:43 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: La La Land (California, USA)
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
Jaif, Ulm's armies are a joke :-) Everyone expects them to be elite and
effective, but I personnaly think that the developers just had an ax
to grind with Germans. The Arbalests are too slow, and their only
advantage over crossbows is that they are better for shooting your own
men in the back. Their infantry gets too tired much too easily. Real
elite infantry eats them for lunch. Their heavy cavalry is truly elite,
but standard heavy cavalry does the same job only marginally less well.
And to top it all off, despite their rather underwhelming mages, everyone
in Ulm has a vulnerability to magic, as opposed to a resistance to it, as
one would expect from a race that stays away from magic.
Oh yeah, it is very hard to get decent scales for them. The fire pick of
their mages makes them old, so you need a life scale, the resource heavy
troops prevent you from taking sloth... all in all, Ulm is a sad, sad race.
In MP games, though, Ulm does OK. Everyone wants to use their forging
services, and thus they are left alone 'till late game. Ulm is often
a member of the winning alliance.
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished...
|
July 21st, 2007, 04:11 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
Quote:
Tuidjy said:Oh yeah, it is very hard to get decent scales for them. The fire pick of their mages makes them old, so you need a life scale, the esource heavy troops prevent you from taking sloth... all in all, Ulm is a sad, sad race.
|
The arbalests are decent infantry.
I agree about the units, mostly. They aren't useless, but they aren't good either.
However, Ulm has very nice choice of scales available to it.
Drain 3 and Production 3 effectively cancel each other out, and provide them with minor bonuses (to gold and to magic resistance of non-Ulmish units - the +1 mr effectively cancels Ulmish troops' weakness). They'll have lots of surplus gold flowing around, thanks to their cheap troops and mages, so they have less need for Order as well.
|
July 21st, 2007, 05:00 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 107
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
Quote:
Tuidjy said:
Jaif, Ulm's armies are a joke :-)
|
I haven't played a lot, and have no MP exposure.
I did play ulm a lot in Dom II. I did that for the atmosphere, and had a lot of fun. Btw, the answer I came up with was not to mix arbs and ulms infantry. I either used arbs with cheap troups, or more often infantry with cheap archers.
But I think we're agreeing here - tien chi's military (ignoring the magic) is better than ulm's.
Btw, I should say I very much favor the opening game. A bad opening means you lose (unless there's heavy politics, which I don't get in SP). A good opening leaves tons of possibilities. I'm just trying to figure out what to do with XXXX-2 at the start of the game, and there really isn't much. I guess the smart thing is to work to conj-6 (celestial soldiers) and const-4 before I worry much about magic aiding the expansion.
-Jeff
|
July 21st, 2007, 05:31 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: La La Land (California, USA)
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
> The arbalests are decent infantry.
Yes. If they had a buckler, they would be good infantry. Unfortunately,
that's not allowed, not for Ulm.
> I either used arbs with cheap troups, or more often infantry with cheap archers.
You have the right idea. Heavy infantry with the "resource three" archers you
get from Druid provinces is a very nice combination against indies and AI.
And of course, the druids' relief was very useful in Dominions II, where druids
could boost themselves to N3 trivially.
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished...
|
July 21st, 2007, 06:16 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land? Tier Two
Tier two research for water magic?
I second the Ice Pebble Staff if you have a gem surplus.
It costs a lot less fatigue than the spell, so you can have a commander cast it around 20 times, if the battle lasts that long.
Shambler Skin armor is a big letdown, but if you have a high defense supercombatant pretender, it can do you a lot of good. Plus, you can now boost your mage with waterpower if you go underwater.
The Ice Sword is a great tool if you've got a commander you want gaining experience and heroic abilities. It is a pretty damaging weapon, and that def boost will help your commanders go around killing so you can pick and choose heroic abilities to develop.
If you've got a lot of low damage troops and are facing heavy infantry/cavalry, Dessication is a decent choice. First off, it has precision 100, though MR is a factor, so it whiffs a lot less than cold bolts. In theory, it could deal 16 fatigue a turn, though averages less. You can check out page 76 for the details on fatigue, but suffice to say, it'll give you more chances at critical hits. There are lot of situations where it is a waste, however, so I don't have this scripted by default.
If you've forged that Ice Pebble Staff, it makes a decent combination with a spellcaster casting dessication. Numbness will slow down and fatigue those troops, giving Dessication a bit longer to work.
There's a few interesting spells just a bit further down the line, but of tier 2, I think this and what others mentioned above just about covers it.
I'm interested whether anyone has ever used Ice Drakes to any affect. I tried four or five against R'lyeh once, and didn't see any return for my investment, but perhaps thats due to MR.
|
July 22nd, 2007, 03:47 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
Ice Drakes can be good if you have other cold-immune troops, and place them appropriately.
Infantry of Ulm is no good in small numbers, but it gets strong when one has the patience to mass enough of them in line (at least, against foes who don't have something that ignores their armor). Cheap in gold for the protection, but sadly for Ulm in MP, there are many things that ignore armor and tend to be easier to amass than a lot of high-resource infantry, especially by mid/late game.
|
July 22nd, 2007, 02:22 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
Where is appropriately for Ice Drakes?
|
July 22nd, 2007, 06:04 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
I put them in small groups just behind a group of cold-resistant melee troops, with orders to Fire Closest. This way, they usually use their short-range breath attack without getting hurt by enemy hand weapons first, and when they run out of breath, they usually mix in with the melee troops, which keeps them from getting ganged up upon.
|
July 22nd, 2007, 09:25 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,355
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Water magic on land?
Neat and elegant. Does that work with 50/75% resistant troops, such as LA Atlantis has, or only with 100%?
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|