MP Sol - CBM EA Game on Llamaserver: Running - Page 20

chrispedersen · #**191** April 24th, 2009, 11:13 PM

Speaking on other matters, in the Dome thread Executor mentioned stacking multiple domes.

There is a bug on stacking multiple domes; as with all games exploiting bugs is against the rules. So I wanted to bring it up and makes sure people were aware of it before it became an issue in game....

Starshine_Monarch · #**192** April 26th, 2009, 07:04 PM

Chris has PM'd me about a mistake in the submission of his turn. Since there are so few of us left anyway, I'm issuing a rollback. We apologize for the inconvenience.

licker · #**193** April 26th, 2009, 07:29 PM

So I assume that I should not resubmit my turn correct?

Since I was happy with it anyway, the orders part at least

Starshine_Monarch · #**194** April 26th, 2009, 10:53 PM

Those that submitted turn 51 already do not need to send it again, so sayeth llamaserver. Once Chris has submitted his turn, I will force hosting as soon as I'm able so we can get on with this.

chrispedersen · #**195** April 28th, 2009, 01:57 PM

May I request an extension? I have (or will have shortly) the current turns in. However, I have been called out of town Wed/Thursday, and so would like a 36 hour extension, delaying any processing on thursday to Fri/sat?

I don't think it actually matters in this game.. but, if by some miracle everyone gets turns in twice in a row in 24 hours.... I'd like to make sure I don't stale ...

Thanks all...

Dragar · #**196** May 6th, 2009, 10:15 AM

This is just my opinion, but given that this game is moving nowhere and that Starshine is quitting, I vote we end it and declare Executor winner.. I was really happy to fight it out, very interesting game, but Starshine was probably in the next best position to win, and we are playing about a turn a week.

If people don't have the heart there is no point continuing, especially when one player is clearly on top and deserving of a win based on the game to date

That said I will always keep playing until the end if people want to continue

chrispedersen · #**197** May 6th, 2009, 12:46 PM

I'd *really* like to not end it. I know I've been responsible for my fair share (and probably then some) of delays recently.

Why don't we all just say - 72 hour turns, and no further delays.
If we stale, we stale - and we all try not to stale.

But we have all put hours and hours and hours into this game...

Executor · #**198** May 6th, 2009, 03:53 PM

I agree with Dragar, I vote we declare Mictlan the winner and end this game.

Starshine_Monarch · #**199** May 7th, 2009, 11:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chrispedersen

I'd *really* like to not end it. I know I've been responsible for my fair share (and probably then some) of delays recently.

Why don't we all just say - 72 hour turns, and no further delays.
If we stale, we stale - and we all try not to stale.

But we have all put hours and hours and hours into this game...

This is assuming I can find a sub for me, and I've had no luck so far. What say we wait until Sunday and if I can't find a sub by then, we'll declare the game ended?

chrispedersen · #**200** May 8th, 2009, 01:37 AM

FakeymcFake will take the position if no one else will. Still, as he is inexperienced with marverni, he would rather a more experienced player take it.