|
|
|
 |
|

October 8th, 2008, 04:11 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
@ Fakeymcfake
There was never any Ashdod-Man NAP in existence to break. The only agreement we ever had was an early peace signing to allow each of our nations to expand without clashing with each other. And this is very different from a NAP. Also, if you did believe you had a NAP with Ashdod, then it is you who broke it first by sending stealthy preachers into Ashdod lands. That is always a sure fire way to violate an NAP.
But politics aside  I'm looking forward to some good battles ahead against the archery kings of Avalon
Edit: Greeting Mictlan 
Last edited by Calahan; October 8th, 2008 at 04:18 AM..
|

October 8th, 2008, 10:56 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Greeting Ashdod.
I certianly couldn't let you have all the fun wothout any of the challenge. Lucky for you I've got my neighbors knocking on the door. Do you think I should let them in?
P.S.: I cast a summon spell. I hope you like it.
|

October 8th, 2008, 12:15 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 477
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
I was fairly certain that we had a 3 turn NAP along with that boarder agreement, could be mistaken though as I'm bad about remembering details. Anyhow the priest was just poking about due to the massive amounts of troops you had sitting on our boarders. In any event, don't take what I say too literally (especially in-game) as I enjoy overly bombastic rhetoric and rarely have a chance to let loose.
In any effect it's now a moot point as war from any cause is still war, and despite the odds I plan on winning or at least severely annoying you to the point of utter frustration.
Last edited by Fakeymcfake; October 8th, 2008 at 12:25 PM..
|

October 8th, 2008, 12:46 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Francisco, nr Wales
Posts: 1,539
Thanks: 226
Thanked 296 Times in 136 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
@ AoE - Can't promise you'll have any fun in Ashdodian lands, but you are welcome to have a look  and if you feel the need to cast a spell or two to aid your enjoyment, then go right ahead  And I'm pretty sure it's good manners to open your door whenever somebody knocks on it. I'm certainly expecting such a courtesy off you when I come-a-banging on Mictlan HQ
@ Fakeymcfake - The Dominions notepad, which I summoned up from my local supermarket, and which I highly recommend to all Dom MP-ers  , tells me that it was just a 'peace' agreement we had, and not any sort of NAP. But as you say, all besides the point now  Looking forward to a good war ahead though. And win or lose, I hope we both have a blast 
|

October 9th, 2008, 05:50 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
hoo has asked for a 4 hour delay. I have granted it in trade for someone's first born child.
|

October 9th, 2008, 05:58 PM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 477
Thanks: 3
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
hoo has asked for a 4 hour delay. I have granted it in trade for someone's first born child.
|
I'm calling "not it" on this one.
|

October 9th, 2008, 08:47 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,099
Thanks: 56
Thanked 122 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
My apologies to my opponents. My battles with Vanheim and Ry'leh both executed in ways I had not planned. The problem with Vanheim was that units I had planned on staying left for the battle against Ry'leh. I beleive I would have won had I the critical mass I thought I had.
As for Ry'leh. My apologies. Every scenario I wanted to avoid happened anyhow due to several scripting mistakes and incorrect assumptions. Yet I managed to win, something that shouldn't have happened. I need to rein in that nature three mage who decided to cast Touch of Madness on slingers. I also need to know from now on that astral spells will likely target you mages over the shambler thralls. How embarrassing.
All is well though. I'll take special care these next few rounds. Especially when swapping units from two different provinces. As for Ashodod, well done. I think I've got solution to those sacreds though. Let's round three begin.
Last edited by AreaOfEffect; October 9th, 2008 at 08:49 PM..
|

October 10th, 2008, 12:43 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by AreaOfEffect
My apologies to my opponents. My battles with Vanheim and Ry'leh both executed in ways I had not planned. The problem with Vanheim was that units I had planned on staying left for the battle against Ry'leh. I beleive I would have won had I the critical mass I thought I had.
As for Ry'leh. My apologies. Every scenario I wanted to avoid happened anyhow due to several scripting mistakes and incorrect assumptions. Yet I managed to win, something that shouldn't have happened. I need to rein in that nature three mage who decided to cast Touch of Madness on slingers. I also need to know from now on that astral spells will likely target you mages over the shambler thralls. How embarrassing.
All is well though. I'll take special care these next few rounds. Especially when swapping units from two different provinces. As for Ashodod, well done. I think I've got solution to those sacreds though. Let's round three begin.
|
I'd love to know why none of my units cast shadow blast like I instructed them to. Or even followed their script at all.
I find communions extremely frustrating most of the time.
Jazzepi
|

October 10th, 2008, 01:28 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 76
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jazzepi
I'd love to know why none of my units cast shadow blast like I instructed them to. Or even followed their script at all.
I find communions extremely frustrating most of the time.
Jazzepi
|
Isn't insanity the trademark of R'Lyeh? Don't expect bunch of creatures who spread insanity to follow your orders 
|

October 10th, 2008, 01:38 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,204
Thanks: 67
Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: Standards - MA Game (running)
Only LA Ry'leh.
Jazzepi
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|