|
|
|
 |
|

August 5th, 2005, 01:56 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
Routers with NAT firewalls are not decent routers.
What?
|

August 5th, 2005, 02:10 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
A NAT is not really a firewall.
And lacking NAT dosen't make it a better router.
__________________
Things you want:
|

August 5th, 2005, 02:44 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
As for power supplies, I personally have everything going through an industrial-strength surge protector (gotten at an auction) first, and have a UPS for my hub, Router and Cable modem.
With the UPS running only those things after I shut down my computer, I can use my laptop to keep chatting here and on the IRC channel while the power is out 
__________________
Things you want:
|

August 5th, 2005, 04:12 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:
With the UPS running only those things after I shut down my computer, I can use my laptop to keep chatting here and on the IRC channel while the power is out
|
Aint it sweet  Gives you someting to do while the power is out 
__________________
Think about it
|

August 5th, 2005, 11:59 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 3,499
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
Quote:
Suicide Junkie said:
A NAT is not really a firewall.
And lacking NAT dosen't make it a better router.
|
NAT isn't a firewall but, without looking back at reference material (in other words, in laymen terms...), it's my understanding NAT logs a request for info leaving the router and when a data packet comes in response to that request, it is allowed to penetrate the router. Any packet coming into the router for which there is not an outstanding request is turned away.
This is the way I understand NAT (but I could be wrong).
So, in theory, this seems like good protection. But, as in anything, multiple barriers are the desired defense, so NAT is just one component of mine.
__________________
ALLIANCE, n. In international politics, the union of two thieves who have their hands so deeply inserted in each other's pocket that they cannot separately plunder a third. (Ambrose Bierce)
|

August 6th, 2005, 12:08 AM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 15,630
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 18 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
I turn mine off for the night, and use sleep mode during the day. Electricity is the primary concern, but the CPU / MB / Video Card / HD heat issues are also of cheif concern.
And the fans make too much noise.
__________________
Creator of the Star Trek Mod - AST Mod - 78 Ship Sets - Conquest Mod - Atrocities Star Wars Mod - Galaxy Reborn Mod - and Subterfuge Mod.
|

August 6th, 2005, 02:16 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: DC Burbs USA
Posts: 1,460
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
NAT lets many LAN addresses share a WAN address and like a switchboard, directs the incomming packets to the correct LAN address.
Once a hacker sniffs out your internal addresses, or guesses, then he can defeat NAT.
__________________
Think about it
|

August 7th, 2005, 10:18 AM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In your mind.
Posts: 2,241
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
Side reason for leaving your computer on all the time:
SETI@home
I mean, this forum has been set up for a 4X space strategy game with more types of aliens than there are ants on this miserable little world. Who doesn't want to help sniff out REAL intelligent extraterrestrial life?
(Well, those leaders of Xenophobic empires, but apart from them.....)
__________________
O'Neill: I have something I want to confess you. The name's not Kirk. It's Skywalker. Luke Skywalker.
-Stargate SG1
|

August 7th, 2005, 07:44 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 412
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
Quote:
Strategia_In_Ultima said:
Side reason for leaving your computer on all the time:
SETI@home
I mean, this forum has been set up for a 4X space strategy game with more types of aliens than there are ants on this miserable little world. Who doesn't want to help sniff out REAL intelligent extraterrestrial life? 
(Well, those leaders of Xenophobic empires, but apart from them.....)
|
Indeed, don't waste your processor. Folding@Home
|

August 8th, 2005, 08:39 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Should computers stay on constantly?
I thought SETI@home was finished now- that they'd processed everything that needed processing.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|