|
|
|
 |
|

May 30th, 2009, 04:58 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,445
Thanks: 85
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
I'd like to see Agartha get an upgrade (Oceania's already being discussed, maybe we could get a thread about Agartha?).
I get that they're supposed to be a "fading people", and that's cool to the point of being truly awesome, but I'd rather see more "glorious tragedy", and less "stoogelike tactics", so yeah, among other things, it would be nice if their equipment got reviewed.
Maybe give them some sort of military fork, to replace their spears? That seems like it might better gel with their low perception, while keeping true to the reality of the cave environment. It would make altering their sprites easier, too.
Another weapon that comes to mind would be a sort of "war spade" (No, I'm not married to the name). Imagine a broad metal spade that's been reinforced and sharpened all around the edge, with a metal t-section crossbar, a long metal-shod shaft, and the classic pitchfork handle. Kind of a cross between a spear and an axe--but not in quite the same way as a glaive.
Might look something like this: D=====ID
Something like that, in the hands of an Ancient Lord, might be a good deal more hand effective and "wieldy" (not to mention thematic) than the axes they currently use.
__________________
You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
|

June 1st, 2009, 04:43 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 177
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
Quote:
Originally Posted by HoneyBadger
Another weapon that comes to mind would be a sort of "war spade" (No, I'm not married to the name). Imagine a broad metal spade that's been reinforced and sharpened all around the edge, with a metal t-section crossbar, a long metal-shod shaft, and the classic pitchfork handle. Kind of a cross between a spear and an axe--but not in quite the same way as a glaive.
Might look something like this: D=====ID
Something like that, in the hands of an Ancient Lord, might be a good deal more hand effective and "wieldy" (not to mention thematic) than the axes they currently use.
|
Zen staff, anyone? 
Be careful - they aren't based on China! :P
|

May 30th, 2009, 05:44 AM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 332
Thanks: 24
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
Quote:
Might look something like this: D=====ID
|
you mean something like this: 8===ID ?
|

May 30th, 2009, 09:04 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,445
Thanks: 85
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
No, you're thinking of another weapon, entirely.
__________________
You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
|

May 30th, 2009, 11:09 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
Why come up with a "military fork", when the game already has the trident: a more damaging polearm already used by some Agarthans (the wet ones) IIRC. Two-handed, but could be used with bucklers like the Olm Spawn do with glaives and bucklers. Stats: Dam 7, att/def 0.
The glaive-users would suck, though. I think I released the weapon rebalance mod already, it did lots of stuff like increase precision of spears/glaives by 1 and increased damage of glaives even further. I didn't test how if affected Agarthans. Getting rid of the attack penalty should help a lot.
|

May 30th, 2009, 01:09 PM
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 353
Thanks: 10
Thanked 14 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
Underwater only the Wet One Commanders got trident, the rest have spear. Why there's a damage difference of 4 between them, I don't know, against any armor a spear should be better - the trident distributes force among three points not a single one.
And why a pike has larger damage than a longspear?
EP, will check out your mod.
|

May 30th, 2009, 02:02 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 332
Thanks: 24
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
how about replacing their spears with longspears and pikes to improve the repelling capabilities of the troopers?
Oh nevermind. They still have -beep- poor attack ...
|

May 30th, 2009, 06:24 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: In Ulm und um Ulm herum
Posts: 787
Thanks: 133
Thanked 78 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
Iirc in WW1 trench warfare (which should come very close to Agartha tunnel warfare) flails and knifes were preferred to bayonets (= spear).
|

June 1st, 2009, 04:48 AM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Moscow, Russia
Posts: 1,045
Thanks: 177
Thanked 23 Times in 21 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
Quote:
Originally Posted by Illuminated One
Iirc in WW1 trench warfare (which should come very close to Agartha tunnel warfare) flails and knifes were preferred to bayonets (= spear).
|
Prrecisely! Short axes and similar weapons, too. Only I seem to remember that Austrians used spiked maces, not flails.
By the way, the only good description of fight in Prof. Tolkien comes from exactly this experience - and in that fight spear gets used exactly once - as a thrown weapon.
|

May 31st, 2009, 03:10 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 3,445
Thanks: 85
Thanked 79 Times in 51 Posts
|
|
Re: Units with stupid weapon choices
Endoperez: Tridents would be perfectly fine. I was trying to distance them a bit from the wet ones, but there's no real pressing reason for them not to use tridents, except possibly the thematic association of tridents with the sea, which I was a bit concerned with.
P3D, you're right about the spear directing more force along it's single point, but one advantage the trident's three points gives is stability, so that it's easier to center an attack. The trident probably wouldn't be able to penetrate the armour as often, but when it did it would make a much wider and more ragged wound--thus more blood spilled, with a greater chance to clip an artery or puncture an organ. The wound would also be considerably harder to treat medically. Another advantage is-and this is specifically because it doesn't go as deep-a trident would have less of a tendancy to get stuck in an opponent.
I think giving them 7 damage is a bit much, however.
Trident stats, in my opinion, should be more like Dam 4, +1 att/0def.
__________________
You've sailed off the edge of the map--here there be badgers!
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|