|
|
|
|
 |
|
June 24th, 2002, 05:43 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: plain madness
Quote:
Originally posted by Baron Munchausen:
Does that mean Stephen King is really a master who can immitate a worthless pulp-fiction hack?
|
Ouch. 
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
June 24th, 2002, 05:43 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New York
Posts: 345
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: plain madness
How about..."master pulp fiction hack"?
__________________
My granddaddy was a toaster.
|
June 24th, 2002, 06:04 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 390
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: plain madness
The Shining (w/Jack Nicholson) was pretty damn good. Can't think of any other "good" King movies though (Shawshank Redemption was good, but was a short story only).
Katchoo
|
June 24th, 2002, 06:12 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: plain madness
LOL...
Stephen King himself hated the Version with Jack Nicholson. He was much happier with another adaptation done a couple years ago.
Edit: You know, there was one good Stephen King movie. It was not a 'horror' story at all, though. Stand By Me -- with Wil Wheaton, btw. Weeeeasly Crusher at 12. 
[ June 24, 2002, 17:14: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ] |
June 24th, 2002, 07:09 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: plain madness
Shawhank Redemtion was Stephen King? I am an idiot for not knowing that. That movie was awesome! I never read the book though.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
June 25th, 2002, 01:01 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 8,450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: plain madness
I was old enough to see sixteen candles when it first came out, but not quite old enough to "get" it. Watched it later and liked it, but Miss Molly struck me as being the worst actress in a pretty good movie. In fact that could be said about a lot of her movies.
Geoschmo
__________________
I used to be somebody but now I am somebody else
Who I'll be tomorrow is anybody's guess
|
June 25th, 2002, 02:44 AM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: plain madness
the problem with many authors is that once they have some money rolling in, they have most of their work ghost written. the author puts together a plot outline, some character descriptions, or just a fricking title. then some other mook writes the actual book.
i wonder how many books King has actually WRITTEN in the Last 10 years. stand by me, tho, was great.
as for sixteen candles, i was always a big fan of John Cusack. and who couldn't like a movie featuring a character called Long Duk Dong. the character interactions with that guy were Hilarious with a capital Hilarious. hmm, maybe i should just plead Dogscoff's excuse and be done with it.
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
