|
|
|
 |
|

June 29th, 2009, 05:29 PM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [Discussion/open]
Count me in please. I vote for ban R'yleh and Ermor
|

June 29th, 2009, 05:41 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [Discussion/open]
If voting is enabled than I am also against R'lyeh and not because it is overpowered but because it is underpowered with such settings.
First, indy 9 is a normal setting nearly for every nation except them. If you don't believe, try creating a game with indy 9 setting and playing several turns. If you took an awake SC, repeat without it.
Second, separate water regions and random starts make things even harder for them.
Third, everything I said above.
Sorry, for too much noise. Just want this game well-balanced.
|

June 29th, 2009, 08:31 PM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 868
Thanks: 56
Thanked 42 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [Discussion/open]
Count me in.
I vote against Ermor, but not Ryleh.
I love CBM, and its been a long time since i played vanilla, but i'm ok without it. (btw, the origional post still says CBM is in.)
|

June 29th, 2009, 08:40 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 731
Thanks: 17
Thanked 36 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [Discussion/open]
I'm in
I'd prefer CBM, and any gem item/tart nerfing
|

June 29th, 2009, 10:04 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 95
Thanks: 7
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [Discussion/open]
If this game is newbie-friendly, then sign me in
|

June 30th, 2009, 05:51 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 11/20]
Updated first post. No CBM. 9 VPs to win. No Ermor+R'lyeh.
We have 11/20 slots taken. 9 more players and we are go.
Well, I still need to find a volunteer for co-administrating. Mainly, to assign players emails and relay to me requests for extensions w/o telling me the requesting player's identity.
Zeldor will roll the nations for us once we are ready.
|

June 30th, 2009, 09:00 AM
|
 |
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Russia, GMT +3
Posts: 623
Thanks: 117
Thanked 57 Times in 45 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 11/20]
Damn, I wish I could play, but can't afford to play more then 1 game at a time.  Always wanted to try out a RANDY game.
|

June 30th, 2009, 09:07 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 731
Thanks: 17
Thanked 36 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 11/20]
Rand games take a lot less time to play due to the lack of diplomacy. C'mon winged dog, you can do it!
|

June 30th, 2009, 09:20 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Serbia
Posts: 2,245
Thanks: 48
Thanked 84 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 11/20]
Rand game? No mods?
I see some people I'd like to play against here/
Please do count me in.
|

June 30th, 2009, 09:26 AM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Poland
Posts: 3,414
Thanks: 26
Thanked 73 Times in 49 Posts
|
|
Re: YARG - Yet Another RAND Game [open 11/20]
No CBM? Strange, but your choice. I could help with co-admining maybe, but it's summer now, so I cannot be sure if I will be available all the time.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|