|
|
|
|
|
June 4th, 2008, 07:45 PM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Utopia, Oregon
Posts: 2,676
Thanks: 83
Thanked 143 Times in 108 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
Actually, so far as I've seen, based on dominion specific modifiers on prophets and such, it seems to treat each combatant as if they had never left the province they are in before the fight. I want to say that I saw an immortal unit survive a loss in the arena, but it was some months back when I actually paid any attention to the death matches. But I do recall very clearly seeing pretenders and prophets with boosted HP, as if they were still in their own dominion. Small chance that I happened to only look at the ones whose dominion actually housed the arena for that match, but that seems highly unlikely to me.
|
June 4th, 2008, 08:12 PM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
You always keep the boosted HP until the "heal" phase of the turn, which is after combat. Click on HP to see "maximum HP", which is what dominion affects. (Regen is also dependent upon maximum HP.)
-Max
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|
June 4th, 2008, 09:53 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
Quote:
JimMorrison said:
Quote:
NTJedi said:
The reward should be scaled based on the current game turn, something like 10 random gems on turn_10 and 70 random gems on turn_70.
|
But think about that, really. Say on turn 30, the DM is worth 30 gems for the prize. How many gems do you have on a decent thug at this point? If you're only hitting a few choice slots, maybe 20-25 gems? Would you really want to risk that thug for a 3/2 payout with 6-8 other people competing for it?
|
Ideally the prize should be an adjustable user setting... small prize, medium prize and large prize. Since an adjustable setting is less likely the prize should increase with caution, thus 30 gems on turn_30.
The 30 gems of a random type on turn_30 is enough to make every player consider sending a thug. On the same note the player shouldn't be equipping the thug while risking an investment of 20 gems. As the game progresses the prize equally grows and so will the threat level of those participating in the competition.
The game should start with a minor prize which scales with the game turn to prevent anything unbalanced until we receive an optional game setting of small_prize, medium_prize and large_prize
__________________
There can be only one.
|
June 5th, 2008, 12:27 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
On the other hand, consider the arena mechanic. All players may spend resources, and only one will benefit from it. If the price is worth a big risk, winning and not losing your thug will be very nice indeed.
If the arena event is too good, it will become unbalanced, and the mods that improve the arena might be banned from MP (compare to mercs).
Banning AI from sending in pretenders or uniques would be good, with no downsides that I can see.
|
June 5th, 2008, 12:35 AM
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Seattle
Posts: 2,497
Thanks: 165
Thanked 105 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
Why are mercs banned from MP? You'd think the auction system would guarantee that a fair price gets paid.
__________________
Bauchelain - "Qwik Ben iz uzin wallhax! HAX!"
Quick Ben - "lol pwned"
["Memories of Ice", by Steven Erikson. Retranslated into l33t.]
|
June 5th, 2008, 01:02 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
At least from blitz games. Nation(s) with mercs won't lose their own troops if the mercs are melee, or will have archer support, and will be able to expand much better than those without mercs. It's not about paying for an advantage. It's about some players having an advantage over others.
The money bid on mercs isn't used for recruiting, and losing time on the early game can be bad as well.
|
June 5th, 2008, 02:02 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
Quote:
Endoperez said:
If the arena event is too good, it will become unbalanced, and the mods that improve the arena might be banned from MP (compare to mercs).
|
I agree... that's why I suggest a small increase such as 30 gems for turn_30. Currently the arena death match event provides almost no value for players to participate. This is quite sad since it could be one of the more interesting events during the game.
Quote:
Endoperez said:
Banning AI from sending in pretenders or uniques would be good, with no downsides that I can see.
|
I completely agree... any unit which is a pretender has a unique tag so it should be fairly simple to prevent pretenders from being part of the match. Unfortunately this change must be complex for Illwinter otherwise I'm sure an effort would have been made by now.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
June 5th, 2008, 02:23 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 731
Thanks: 17
Thanked 36 Times in 17 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
What about stick as well as carrot? Make it compulsory to send a unit in to a death match. You can choose to send a weak commander in, and guarantee losing him, or send a strong one in to try and win and kill everyone elses. Agree Pretenders should be banned, would make a SC pretender too powerful a choice.
|
June 5th, 2008, 02:28 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
Quote:
Dragar said:
What about stick as well as carrot? Make it compulsory to send a unit in to a death match. You can choose to send a weak commander in, and guarantee losing him, or send a strong one in to try and win and kill everyone elses. Agree Pretenders should be banned, would make a SC pretender too powerful a choice.
|
The suggestion of banning all pretenders is a good idea since no wise veteran player would ever consider the idea.
__________________
There can be only one.
|
June 5th, 2008, 03:19 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Tucson Az
Posts: 463
Thanks: 11
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Death Match Competition
I really like the stick and carrot approach as well as removing the compete in death match order possibility from pretenders.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|