Exploit question - Page 5

K · #41 December 18th, 2009, 12:54 AM

Hey Rdonj,

Making personal attacks muddies the discourse. If you have nothing to add, please refrain from posting.

Trumanator · #42 December 18th, 2009, 12:59 AM

lol, K complaining about muddying the discourse, when every other post he makes has some embittered reference to how he can't abuse MoD anymore.

Tollund · #43 December 18th, 2009, 01:10 AM

You words don't cease to be personal attacks just because you don't name the people you are complaining about. Your post was a giant personal attack against every single person who doesn't agree with you, accusing them of being irrational. It's a standard tactic used by people who want to insult others while still flying under the radar of mods.

rdonj · #44 December 18th, 2009, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by K

Hey Rdonj,

Making personal attacks muddies the discourse. If you have nothing to add, please refrain from posting.

I have no need to respond to this anyway, as others have convincingly made my arguments for me

Way to prove me wrong btw.

K · #45 December 18th, 2009, 01:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rdonj

Quote:

Originally Posted by K

Hey Rdonj,

Making personal attacks muddies the discourse. If you have nothing to add, please refrain from posting.

I have no need to respond to this anyway, as others have convincingly made my arguments for me

Way to prove me wrong btw.

What is there to prove wrong? You didn't say anything of value.

I expressed an opinion of a disturbing trend I have noticed where people try to get minor tactics in the game banned for no logical reason. You personally attacked me. End of story.

Now this thread sucks. Congratulations.

You did inspire me to find the ignore list, so I have to thank you for that.

rdonj · #46 December 18th, 2009, 02:07 AM

Okay, y'all can get back to talking about bogus now.

Lingchih · #47 December 18th, 2009, 02:23 AM

I do have a build, atm, that makes Bogus come up quite frequently. No idea why, but I've gotten him three times now. I'm running out of people to put "precious" on, so it is becoming attractive to charm him and his troops.

That said, if I did charm the archer, I would probably re-distribute his orders. Nothing about banning it was said in the game thread. Overlords game, which is kind of a cluster-frack anyway.

Zeldor · #48 December 18th, 2009, 04:48 AM

Someone is trying to argue with feebleminded again?

LDiCesare · #49 December 18th, 2009, 05:26 AM

Quote:

Since the devs apparently removed those orders from the game when a previous version of the game had them, I'd say there's a good chance they consider it an exploit as well.

I must say that, as K, I remember the devs saying they didn't feel like it was an exploit. Namely, they want these orders to stay on Bogus's party, and didn't mind if someone copied their orders.

Sombre · #50 December 18th, 2009, 09:14 AM

LDiCesare: Since K seems to have left the thread in a hissy fit, maybe you could point me to where they said it isn't an exploit. I'm not disputing that they did but since you remember it, it would probably be easier for you to find than me and I'd like to see what they said about it.

I don't think their stance has that much bearing on the topic of this thread since the majority of people I've heard from still fall into camp #2. But it would be nice to know.