|
|
|
|
 |
|
May 2nd, 2010, 11:47 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
I really know I should add something useful to this incredible post. But it's late, I'm tired, and just too Sombre now.
__________________
Be forewarned, anything I post is probably either 1) Sophomoric humor, 2) Satire, 3) A gross exaggeration of the power I currently possess, 4) An outright lie, or 5) Drunken ramblings.
I occasionally post something useful.
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Lingchih For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:01 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Japan
Posts: 3,691
Thanks: 269
Thanked 397 Times in 200 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Frozen Lama, how could you so blatantly misquote Peter Ebbesen? I distinctly remember his post being something much more along the lines of:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peter Ebbesen
Whine whine whine, I'm a tool.
|
__________________
Whether he submitted the post, or whether he did not, made no difference. The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed— would still have committed, even if he had never set pen to paper— the essential crime that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime was not a thing that could be concealed forever.
http://z7.invisionfree.com/Dom3mods/index.php?
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to vfb For This Useful Post:
|
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:10 AM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 518
Thanks: 26
Thanked 55 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Bull pucker! I have read and reread the rules. In no way did I violate them.
I may have pushed them to extreme limits.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:12 AM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 518
Thanks: 26
Thanked 55 Times in 29 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Oh Peter don't feel too bad. I rarely post anything worth reading. Those who really know me don't bother reading my crap.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:15 AM
|
 |
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Osaka, Japan
Posts: 481
Thanks: 42
Thanked 33 Times in 12 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
So this is some kind of protest? Perhaps a little background would be useful. All I got so far is that Sombre (a frequent, fairly useful, sometimes acerbic, contributor here) got banned for some unknown reason, and that plenty of folks are upset.
Is it a genuine jerk move by the Forum mods? If so, explain (or would that violate the forum rules).
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:16 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 2,157
Thanks: 69
Thanked 116 Times in 73 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
So this is some kind of protest? Perhaps a little background would be useful. All I got so far is that Sombre (a frequent, fairly useful, sometimes acerbic, contributor here) got banned for some unknown reason, and that plenty of folks are upset.
Is it a genuine jerk move by the Forum mods? If so, explain (or would that violate the forum rules).
|
I sombrely submit it would violate forum rules. See the scenario + mod forum thread on the subject.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:17 AM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,735
Thanks: 272
Thanked 120 Times in 93 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
If so, explain (or would that violate the forum rules).
|
It is against rules. And we also don't want to violate Sombre's privacy.
|
May 3rd, 2010, 12:18 AM
|
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Seattle
Posts: 868
Thanks: 56
Thanked 42 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: Managing Communions - the sombre challenge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoBits
So this is some kind of protest? Perhaps a little background would be useful. All I got so far is that Sombre (a frequent, fairly useful, sometimes acerbic, contributor here) got banned for some unknown reason, and that plenty of folks are upset.
Is it a genuine jerk move by the Forum mods? If so, explain (or would that violate the forum rules).
|
well yes i suppose. And our benevolent Mods have kindly declined to tell us their side of why a very helpful member got perma banned (which violates their forum rules btw since he didn't get the two temp bans).
or better yet read here: http://forum.shrapnelgames.com/showthread.php?t=45498
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
 Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|
