|
|
|
|
|
March 10th, 2005, 08:04 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Infantry Balance Mod
Quote:
Scott Hebert said:
Actually, I think the Crystal Amazons still qualify as the rarest indy archer.
|
Considering you need to use wish to get them...
|
March 10th, 2005, 09:56 PM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Titusville, FL
Posts: 450
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Infantry Balance Mod
Oh, do you? I can remember (way back in the single digit versions) that I did find a Crystal Amazon province in a game or two...
Air/Astral, bowmen, Pegasus Riders, in plains, right?
__________________
Scott Hebert
Gaming Aficionado
Modding Beginner
|
March 10th, 2005, 10:00 PM
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Alaska
Posts: 2,968
Thanks: 24
Thanked 221 Times in 46 Posts
|
|
Re: Infantry Balance Mod
Quote:
Scott Hebert said:
Oh, do you? I can remember (way back in the single digit versions) that I did find a Crystal Amazon province in a game or two...
Air/Astral, bowmen, Pegasus Riders, in plains, right?
|
It is possible thier disappearance happened in a patch, but I think they have been gone since dom I. Though they may be preplaced in a scenario or two.
|
March 11th, 2005, 05:51 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Infantry Balance Mod
They are placed in a province in Tyrande, although the defenders were general LI/HI/Archers.
|
March 13th, 2005, 06:29 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Infantry Balance Mod
Quote:
Arryn said:
The version number given in the .dm file was 4. I adjusted it to 5 before I uploaded it to my site. FYI.
Keep up the great work!
|
Thanks, Arryn; I can always count on you But I'll try harder anyway!
Quote:
Scott Hebert said:
Saber, I'm working on the 'mounted' cost from the commander end. It seems like 40g is the cost you pay for a mounted commander. That seems... rather extreme, to me. I do realize, though, that being mounted invariably adds at least one 'extra attack' (that doesn't disappear with rearming), increases AP, removes non-spell fatigue due to armor, and similar things.
Anyway, I figure that halving the cost (going from commander to infantry) might be a way of going there. That would leave 20g.
Another way of looking at it is this:
Infantry commander base cost: 10
Infantry unit base cost: 5 (half)
Add a couple of gold for the weapons of the infantry (after all, you can't re-equip them like commanders), and you get about the 7g that you use for light infantry, right?
Cavalry commander base cost: 50
Cavalry unit base cost: 25 (half)
It would seem fair. Just a suggestion...
|
Cavalry unit cost is sort of confusing. I've been thinking and thinking... but no matter how reasonable your rationale is, we end up with 25g light cavalry that NOBODY is going to buy
However, light cavalry just use horses... you know, horsey-worseies. Whereas heavy cavalry use huge warhorses bred for strength and trained for battle... and armored! Well, I don't know if this is reasonable or not, but these are the factors I considered and their approximate costs. I made up all the numbers myself rather than analyzing Illwinter's numbers, and didn't really follow them very closely... Also, Illwinter never really factored in the resource cost of breeding and training horses.
Code:
-- Cavalry Guidelines:
-- Note that the existance of guidelines does not mean they are followed.
-- Type Protection GCOST RCOST ENC MOVE
-- Light: 0-9 14 +4 4 3
-- Medium: 10-14 22 x1.5+6 4 2
-- Heavy: 15+ 30 x2+10 5 2
-- Elite: 17+ & stats+ 40 x2+12 5 2
-- Other factors to consider:
-- Factor GCOST
-- Bow: +2
-- Light Lance: +2
-- Full Lance: +6
-- Mount Attacks: varies
-- Trample: +.25*(size^3)
-- Mount Survives Rider: +10 (varies)
-- Mount Joins Army: varies
-- Slower Than a Horse: -2 to 10
-- Protection Above Minimum: +0 to 2 each
-- Bonus Stats: varies
-- Other changes: all cavs get +1 str to reflect mount's momentum,
-- and +2 hp to reflect hits taken by the mount (+3 on heavy cav)
-- heavy and medium cavs get minimum 11 morale
-- light cav precision penalties reduced, for 4 reasons:
-- 1) higher seat gives better vision and better angle
-- 2) they are trained to shoot / throw from horseback
-- 3) horses will often be still when firing
-- 4) the penalty made them worthless
Anyway, thanks for your analysis!
Quote:
Ironhawk said:Yeah, I can appreciate how tough of a decision this one would be. With 9AP damage longbows definitely are the supreme missle weapon. But then again, in my experience, longbowmen are the rarest indy archer type. Which fits in with the reality of longbows (they were elite archers, basically) and its good for game balance too.
Interesting side note: Why are there no sacred archer units? I just envisioned Man with sacred longbowmen and a W9 blessing.
|
Since longbows are quite rare, have virtually no armor, and are 30% to 100% more expensive than other archers, I guess it should be OK. As for holy archers - there are Crystal Amazon Pegasus Riders and Centaur Hierophants... But nothing common or cheap.
Quote:
Ighalli said:I love the R'lyeh hybrid descriptions!!
You didn't make them upkeep free like you had mentioned though. Did you get them mixed up with the void gate summons?
|
Thanks!
As for the hybrids: They are recruitable with money, and require upkeep, though I did drop the prices of the inferior ones. I eliminated the upkeep on Void Gate Summons (Elder Thing, Vastness, Otherness, Thing of Many Eyes, etc). I don't know if they had upkeep before, but they definitely do not now.
So! I've spent about 30 hours in the last several days, smoothing over the previous changes, spotting and correcting bugs, and redoing every cavalry unit in the game. I also added some neat new weapons and armor to units that really needed them. For example: Soulless have no vital organs. They tend not to die from arrows. So I gave them "Missile Protection" (technically, a 0 prot, 0 enc, 1 def shield, and lowered their def by 1 to compensate). It should make arrows slightly less effective on Soulless, without affecting anything else. And I gave Sidhe / Tuatha full bronze equipment, based on their descriptions of "Hating iron and only using Bronze and Leather."
You can look at the attached picture to see some of the new armor and weapons
I'm in the final stages of debugging (primarily, ensuring that no units are missing attacks, got their description cleared, cost too much or too little, or have the wrong unit number for their name) and plan to release the first non-beta today or tomorrow. Thanks for all your comments!
|
March 14th, 2005, 07:31 AM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Recruitable Rebalance Version 6, non-beta, is out!
This is the first complete, non-beta release. You can grab it (and read the release notes) at the first post in the thread. You can also see a screenshot of some of the new weapons and armor that units are sporting in the post above this one
Have fun, and I hope you enjoy it!
|
March 14th, 2005, 09:32 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Recruitable Rebalance Version 6, non-beta, is out!
Looks very nice! Am away from home atm and cannot test, but will try to do so soon.
Naive question: Can many mods modding stuff such as this exist at once? (E.g., since I selected light cav for my Oglala mod, feedback on which I am still desperately seeking (shameless plug), and you have modded them, will that cause a conflict?)
Really Smallish Question: Would you also consider incorporating my Abysian Salamander changes to your mod by the same logic you changed the Vanheimian Fay Boar ("did anyone ever buy one before?") -- 75 gcost, sacred.
Anyhow, thanks for this mod, it looks like a lot of work, and I appreciate it -- for me, modding is really tough, and it would be abysmal without feedback.
|
March 14th, 2005, 02:22 PM
|
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: La La Land (California, USA)
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Re: Recruitable Rebalance Version 6, non-beta, is out!
What we need now is a game in which all spells beyond level 2 and all pretenders
with magic path cost over 10 are disabled. It would be the perfer way to test
this mod.
If it is not PBEM (I seem unable to stick to these) I would like to join.
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished...
|
March 14th, 2005, 05:34 PM
|
|
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Crystal Tokyo
Posts: 2,453
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Recruitable Rebalance Version 6, non-beta, is
Quote:
tinkthank said:
Looks very nice! Am away from home atm and cannot test, but will try to do so soon.
|
Thanks!
Quote:
Naive question: Can many mods modding stuff such as this exist at once? (E.g., since I selected light cav for my Oglala mod, feedback on which I am still desperately seeking (shameless plug), and you have modded them, will that cause a conflict?)
|
I don't think so... I think the computer loads mods alphabetically, and mine is named "Cherry Recruitable Rebalance", so "Oglala Sioux" should be processed second, with your changes overriding my changes. But I might try that out later today and see.
Quote:
Really Smallish Question: Would you also consider incorporating my Abysian Salamander changes to your mod by the same logic you changed the Vanheimian Fay Boar ("did anyone ever buy one before?") -- 75 gcost, sacred.
|
I changed them to 55g, made their fire flare much better, and made Beast Trainers cheaper. However, it does make sense that they should be sacred - not necessarily because Abysians worship hot things (although they do), but because salamanders shouldn't get paid so much after they are trained, since they don't have a use for money Hmmm... I guess 75g and sacred sounds fair. I'll have to retype the description to incorporate that change.
Quote:
Anyhow, thanks for this mod, it looks like a lot of work, and I appreciate it -- for me, modding is really tough, and it would be abysmal without feedback.
|
I completely agree. Thanks for the feedback!
Quote:
Tuidjy said:What we need now is a game in which all spells beyond level 2 and all pretenders
with magic path cost over 10 are disabled. It would be the perfer way to test
this mod.
If it is not PBEM (I seem unable to stick to these) I would like to join.
|
It would be very interesting to test this mod without powerful magic and supercombattants... it would change Dominions II into (as close as I can make it to) the low-magic medieval military conflicts in most fantasy novels, like Lord of the Rings, Magician, or A Game of Thrones. However, I'm not sure how much interest there would be, as most Dominions II players (on this forum) seem to love powerful magic. I'd be up for it, though! Of course, it would take several more hours to disable all those gods and spells...
|
March 14th, 2005, 10:57 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 3,011
Thanks: 0
Thanked 45 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: Recruitable Rebalance Version 6, non-beta, is
It's too bad you missed the Age of Men game. I designed it to be more about national armies and less about magic and SCs. It was quite fun!! And for the record I would certainly be interested if you are starting a game of that type up with your mod. Send me a PM or something if you do.
Quote:
Saber Cherry said:
It would be very interesting to test this mod without powerful magic and supercombattants... it would change Dominions II into (as close as I can make it to) the low-magic medieval military conflicts in most fantasy novels, like Lord of the Rings, Magician, or A Game of Thrones. However, I'm not sure how much interest there would be, as most Dominions II players (on this forum) seem to love powerful magic. I'd be up for it, though! Of course, it would take several more hours to disable all those gods and spells...
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|