End of Time 3 - Running - Page 7

Quitti · #1 November 2nd, 2009, 02:00 AM

You can check llamaserver game stales from the webpage -> game page -> admin options -> staling data. While it's in located in the "admin" part of the game, anyone can access it.

I'm usually not a fan of rollbacks...

Erebus · #2 November 2nd, 2009, 03:12 AM

The situation between Utgård and C'tis is quite delicate at the moment. So if Utgård wants a rollback, it's for a good reason.

Deathjester · #3 November 2nd, 2009, 04:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Erebus

The situation between Utgård and C'tis is quite delicate at the moment. So if Utgård wants a rollback, it's for a good reason.

Coming from the god of C'tis, that's a honorable statement. Thanks.

johnarryn · #4 November 2nd, 2009, 09:52 AM

Im just going to go ahead and roll it back as an executive decision, so people, please take the same actions you did previously (except for Utgard and anyone interacting with him) so as not to gain any advantage from this.... ill trust everyone to abide by that.

Actually, looking at the llamaserver faq, it seems that as long as deathjester sends in his .2h and no one else does, they will all take the same actions as they would have anyhow. So NO ONE ELSE SEND IN A .2h but Deathjester

johnarryn · #5 November 2nd, 2009, 11:16 AM

Folks,

I rolled back the turn, and then allowed Utgard to take his turn. I then hosted... your old orders should have been the same. Let me know if this is not the case.

We will otherwise proceed as normal. So make sure you send in the .2h for the most recent turn.

Maerlande · #6 November 2nd, 2009, 11:34 AM

Status page is sitting at turn 33 with only Utgard submitted. No turn received.

Maerlande · #7 November 2nd, 2009, 11:59 AM

Actually, I see that llamaserver stopped updating at 14:40. Looks like it's stuck.

johnarryn · #8 November 2nd, 2009, 02:22 PM

It hosted, and I received my turn with no problems... so game continues as normal.

Quitti · #9 November 2nd, 2009, 03:28 PM

I've recieved my turn also.

Deathjester · #10 November 2nd, 2009, 04:25 PM

Me too, and I can confirm that things did turn out a bit differently when I could actually do something with 25-30 commanders under siege.

Thank you for handling it well John, a mistake can anyone do, it's how you handle the consequences that count.

And thanks to everyone else for the patience..