|
|
|
|
|
April 16th, 2008, 05:21 PM
|
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 106
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Underwater fire? Bug or WAD?
I found that fire shield from Charkoal Shield and "small area fire" from firebrand works fine underwater. Is this a bug or WAD? Anyway Charkoal Shield is realy evil underwater chaffcleaner. I think its wrong.
|
April 16th, 2008, 05:25 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Eastern Finland
Posts: 7,110
Thanks: 145
Thanked 153 Times in 101 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
Most fire and fire-based evocations don't work under water. There are no exceptions for weapons that deal fire damage, and that wouldn't be trivial either. I could see fire-shield being weakened under water, and removing it alltogether might also fit.
|
April 16th, 2008, 05:39 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
Probably there should be no fire shield under water at all because the spell itself cannot be cast there. So, if Charcoal Shield does provide fireshield underwater, this is definitely a bug.
And the same with Fire brand, I think.
|
April 16th, 2008, 06:16 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 12
Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
UW combat sucks enough as it is, leave the items alone =)
|
April 16th, 2008, 06:30 PM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 34
Thanked 59 Times in 37 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
Fire shield underwater is at least strange and unthematic
|
April 16th, 2008, 07:41 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 12
Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
Ano - It's actually not, if you read the charcoal shield description, which is entirely heat-based and doesn't mention anything about actual flame. Besides, it's magic. The fire brand IS flame based, but again, magic. The entire purpose of the items is to be on fire, I don't find it particularly unthematic that a bit of water fails to stop them from filling their purpose (unlike a mage, who is less single-minded and more prone to fatigue). Anyhow, again, UW combat sucks.
|
April 16th, 2008, 08:10 PM
|
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 475
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
Heh, I've no trouble imagining a sword and shield so hot that
they "boil" underwater. After all they burn just fine in the
middle of a snowstorm or pouring rain. What's really
interesting is if they set opponents on fire underwater.
Because that would be an awesome special effect in a future
Dominions movie.
Next you will start to complain about frozen enemies not
floating to the surface.
|
April 16th, 2008, 10:02 PM
|
Private
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 43
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
I imagine the analog for setting someone on fire underwater would be trapping them in a cloud of boiling bubbles that for some reason won't just float up to the top.
Killing bubbles!
|
April 17th, 2008, 01:21 AM
|
|
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 340
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
Bubbles of Doom.
|
April 17th, 2008, 05:32 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 5,463
Thanks: 165
Thanked 324 Times in 190 Posts
|
|
Re: Underwater fire?
Another thread where people who like it the way it is can easily come up with explanations and so can people who would like it changed. As to which are more reasonable,..
I don't mind either way, as long as there's a clear description saying 'Does not work underwater' or 'Even works underwater' if it isn't obvious.
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|