|
|
|
|
|
April 30th, 2003, 03:11 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 2,903
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Hey, check out this page which has drawings of Star Trek, Star Wars, and Babylon 5 ships to scale, compared to real ships and buildings. There's the Empire State Building, Eiffel Tower, Statue of Liberty, etc compared to Godzilla, Battlestar Galactica, Galaxy Class Starship, Omega Class Destroyer, Star Wars Space Slug, etc.
Each drawing is scaled to 1 pixel = 1 meter.
http://mirror.wolffelaar.nl/zardalu.sytes.net/
|
April 30th, 2003, 03:30 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Wonderful site. I hope it adds even more stuff later. It's spiffy how you can drag the images around, too.
PvK
|
April 30th, 2003, 03:51 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
|
April 30th, 2003, 04:06 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
COOOOOOOOL!
Esp. the drag-around feature.
Disappointing how he didn't include the death star. hehe, maybe thats a bit off-scale.
I think the SSD falls into that Category too - 8km if memory serves. the ISD is completely manageable though, its, er, um 1400m?
And B5, about the same, 5 mi.
Interesting, the current total length is something close to pi miles. (at the longest ~5.5 km)
edit: nope, the ISD is 1600m. but the SSD is 8km.
edit edit: Thanks for the silhouette one. I like the borg part. :b
[ April 30, 2003, 03:17: Message edited by: Gwaihir ]
|
April 30th, 2003, 04:29 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: CHEESE!
Posts: 10,009
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 1 Post
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
naaaaarf
__________________
If I only could remember half the things I'd forgot, that would be a lot of stuff, I think - I don't know; I forgot!
A* E* Se! Gd! $-- C-^- Ai** M-- S? Ss---- RA Pw? Fq Bb++@ Tcp? L++++
Some of my webcomics. I've got 400+ webcomics at Last count, some dead.
Sig updated to remove non-working links.
|
April 30th, 2003, 06:36 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Indiana
Posts: 3,229
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Quote:
Originally posted by General Woundwort:
It's only plain black silhouettes, but it offers more ships, including the Borg Cube and the absolutely necessary Imperial Star Destroyer.
|
That's hard to believe that the Borg Cube is that much bigger then the Intrepid class ship (Voyager) Just a rough guess would be that the Cube is over 500 times bigger then the Intrepid. And Voyager beat how many of those cubes without being destroyed?!?
I can see the Cube being like 50-100 times bigger but gees.
__________________
Ragnarok - Hevordian Story Thread
-------------------
I think...therefore I am confused.
They were armed. With guns, said Omari.
Canadians. With guns. And a warship. What is this world coming to?
The dreaded derelict dwelling two ton devil bunny!
Every ship can be a minesweeper... Once
|
April 30th, 2003, 07:49 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
I generally have little or no interest in TNG ships, but it looks like the two sites disagree about the relative sizes of TNG Fed Galaxy ships and TNG Rom Warbirds.
And ya, I want to see the Imperial Star Destroyer on the flashy site, too.
Oh, and I think King Kong is smaller than in the films, not to mention the "vs. Godzilla" films.
PvK
|
April 30th, 2003, 09:15 AM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 109
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
I think they got his size from the origninal movie, probably from his scale against the empire state building. Wait, no, you're right, he has to be bigger! that size definitely cannot swat planes. Of course, maybe I should actually watch the original, rather than going by the poster art, which is probably exaggerated.
|
April 30th, 2003, 09:21 AM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Southern CA, USA
Posts: 18,394
Thanks: 0
Thanked 12 Times in 10 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
I can't move anything around on that site.
And Romulan warbirds are a lot larger than Federation Galaxy Class ships (something like 2-3x as large).
Quote:
I'd gladly give the original artist credit, but I have no clue who he or she was.]
|
That is from Babylon Trek Wars. I can't seem to find any mention of the author...
[ April 30, 2003, 08:30: Message edited by: Imperator Fyron ]
|
April 30th, 2003, 10:49 AM
|
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 1,311
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: OT: Starship size comparisons 1 pixel per meter
Quote:
Originally posted by Imperator Fyron:
That is from Babylon Trek Wars. I can't seem to find any mention of the author...
|
Yes, that was the site. Did it move? The only link I have to it is defunct.
Quote:
Originally posted by Gwaihir:
Disappointing how he didn't include the death star. hehe, maybe thats a bit off-scale.
|
BTW had another size chart for the bases (Death Stars I and II, B5, etc). I just didn't download it.
[ April 30, 2003, 09:54: Message edited by: General Woundwort ]
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|