How many players in a game do you prefer?

[mlmbd]

I agree with SJ and Mr. tesco samoa.

2 maybe 3 players in a hotseat tactical combat.

8 players seems good in multi-player, sorry PBW! I'm new at this.

mlmbd

[SamuraiProgrammer]

An even number of players to reduce the possibility of odd man out. For example, 2v1 or 2v2v1

[Ruatha]

I like em all. From one on one to massive.
I'm playing PBW games with 8, 12 and hosting one with 19 players. All running along fine.
In the game with 19 players, most turns everyone submits, sometimes someone misses.
Had two dropouts during the game so far, not much. There were more in the 8 player game.

[DirectorTsaarx]

I voted for solo, because I don't play regularly enough to feel comfortable in a multi-player game. (i.e., I'd feel guilty missing lots of turns)

Ah, if only real life didn't intrude on game time so much...

[ December 12, 2002, 21:22: Message edited by: DirectorTsaarx ]

[Chronon]

I think seven is about the right number of players for PBW and multiplay. Many of the classic multi-player board games, like Diplomacy, have seven players. Seven works well because things stay fluid - there is no inevitable groupings of teams like there would be for four or six players (2v2 or 3v3). Plus, in PBW anyway, seven moves pretty fast.

[ December 12, 2002, 22:02: Message edited by: Chronon ]

[Gryphin]

2 or 3 in a small quadrant hot seat or PBEM.
I feel I just don't have the "nature" to get involved in PBW beyond the GB.

[Unknown_Enemy]

more players = more mess

more mess = more fun

between 6-8 and you may have not too many drop out in a long game.