|
|
|
 |

December 14th, 2001, 07:07 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Armor, Shields and Damage (FAQ)
It has been so long since I first read the original post on this thread, that I forgot all that information was in there. The original post fits my experiences fighting Organic Armor. It is much easier to defeat at a warp-point battle. Null Space work great, but they are costly.
|

December 14th, 2001, 07:17 PM
|
 |
Sergeant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN, USA
Posts: 222
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Armor, Shields and Damage (FAQ)
Getting back to the discussion of Organic Armor on units being useless. It will be useless for the regeneration aspect. However, there is another advantage to Organic Armor that many overlook: it takes no metal resources. Almost everything a non Organic player builds is limited time wise based on Metal, not Radioactives or Organics. If using Organic Armor can even out the cost ratio of your unit design, you may be able to build some extra ones every turn at your planet or shipyard.
|

December 15th, 2001, 12:51 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: iola, ks, usa
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Armor, Shields and Damage (FAQ)
quote: Originally posted by LGM:
Getting back to the discussion of Organic Armor on units being useless. It will be useless for the regeneration aspect. However, there is another advantage to Organic Armor that many overlook: it takes no metal resources. . . . If using Organic Armor can even out the cost ratio of your unit design, you may be able to build some extra ones every turn at your planet or shipyard.
An excellent point. I think that benefit was intentionally designed in, although I think that organics should be useful to everyone, not just Organics races. One way to do that is to mod things like life support, crew quarters, the various supply components (well some of them wouldn't fit very well, description wise), and Colony components to greatly increase their organics cost. But in doing so, one must be careful not to take away the organics benefit of more balanced construction costs. (Unless you think Organics is too powerful, anyway...)
Ok, sorry for the OT response there. It's late and I'm babbling.....
|

December 15th, 2001, 01:34 PM
|
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: iola, ks, usa
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Armor, Shields and Damage (FAQ)
quote: Originally posted by [K126]Mephisto:
Methinks that no special armor abilities are working.
Um, does that include Scattering and Stealth armor? I'm pretty sure that the cloaking isn't working (At least, it shouldn't, anyway...), but what about the tohit bonuses? What about ECM? I'm pretty sure that combat sensors, Events predictors, etc. work (at least, they should...)
|

December 15th, 2001, 05:50 PM
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Ohio, USA
Posts: 4,323
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Armor, Shields and Damage (FAQ)
quote: Originally posted by LGM:
Getting back to the discussion of Organic Armor on units being useless. It will be useless for the regeneration aspect. However, there is another advantage to Organic Armor that many overlook: it takes no metal resources. Almost everything a non Organic player builds is limited time wise based on Metal, not Radioactives or Organics. If using Organic Armor can even out the cost ratio of your unit design, you may be able to build some extra ones every turn at your planet or shipyard.
The first advantage of Organic armor is that it's tougher than standard armor. Don't forget the total damage rating. Since units don't track internal components, this is actually more effective for units than for ships and bases. It increases the total damage needed to destroy the unit. In a stack of satellites this can really add up.
[ 15 December 2001: Message edited by: Baron Munchausen ]
|

December 15th, 2001, 08:13 PM
|
 |
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 11,451
Thanks: 1
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
Re: Armor, Shields and Damage (FAQ)
quote: The first advantage of Organic armor is that it's tougher than standard armor.
25% stronger at max tech...
The problem is that shields aren't tracked separately from the hull in unit stacks anymore, so a shield generator will blow away any armor in terms of defense. (2x the strength of standard armor!)
Unit shields are not even affected by shield depleters!
Unless your enemies are packing null-space cannons, you'd be better off with shields.
__________________
Things you want:
|

December 17th, 2001, 02:25 AM
|
 |
Brigadier General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
Posts: 1,994
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Armor, Shields and Damage (FAQ)
Every to hit bonus plus is welcome for a weapon platform but why go for a to hit bonus defense? A planet is nearly always hit and so is the weapon platform on it.
__________________
For, in the final analysis, our most basic common link is that we all inhabit this small planet. We all breathe the same air. We all cherish our children's futures. And we are all mortal. - JFK
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|