Umm, have to bring up the new "look"

Lion of High Park · #1 April 3rd, 2001, 04:06 PM

Interesting thread. And I'd just like to comment that this again shows the remarkable attention to customer support that the people at Shrapnel Games and MM have always shown. As another poster has said, you would never see this kind of dedication to their customers from one of the larger companies.

I just came from the survey, and found that it is currently almost exactly evenly split between, yes, no and don't care with regards to the bullet logo on the intel forums. Personally, I don't mind the bullet from a political standpoint for a wargaming forum (I'm Canadian from a big city, and my personal views on guns leans towards minimizing their presence in the hands of private citizens. But the gun control debate seems a little too large for an issue like decoration of the forum.). From an aesthetic point of view, however, the bullet doesn't really do a lot for me.

dogscoff · #2 April 3rd, 2001, 04:32 PM

Sabre is right to say that this is getting out of hand. I think people's opinions on the politics of gun ownership and their opinions on the bullet image are getting confused. The two are not necessarily the same: I for one disagree with public gun ownership but understand and accept Shrapnel's choice of imagery.

Personally I think that if we keep talking about this gun ownership thing we risk bringing bad feeling into the forum: Whichever side of the debate you come down on you have to admit it's one of those issues where debate tends to have little effect on peoples' opinions.
I've had arguments on these sorts of issues before and the only resolution is to agree to disagree.

I'm not afraid of conflicting opinions or debate and I'm not telling anyone what to do but we are way off topic I for one am leaving this thread alone as of now.

------------------
There is an exception to every rule. Including this one.

[This message has been edited by dogscoff (edited 03 April 2001).]

dmm · #3 April 3rd, 2001, 06:36 PM

IT'S NOT A BULLET!!!!

It's a lipstick dispenser.
They are trying to attract more females.

CaptSpoogy · #4 April 3rd, 2001, 06:47 PM

For me, it's not an issue about guns and gun control - I just don't think it fits in very well with the form.

I said this earlier and someone else mentioned it as well, since it's the "intel" forum - some sort of "Top Secret" stamp motif would be better suited.

In Canada, they have introduced new controls where you obtain a special license that allows you to buy ammunition which I think is a good idea - but I think the government having too much info about the owners can lead to trouble. For example, if the police are called to a domestic dispute and they look up that one of the people have a gun - and they going to come with guns drawn?

I think the license is good - but we got to do more keeping illegal guns off the streets - that will make a bigger difference.

[This message has been edited by capt_spoogy (edited 03 April 2001).]

CaptSpoogy · #5 April 3rd, 2001, 06:50 PM

Some additional Comments:

I must admit that I'm against hunting for sport. I think it is stupid - what kind of challenge is it to kill an animal with a high power rifle?

What's the problem with going out with a camera, finding the animals and taking a nice picture of it? What purpose does it serve to kill it for sport? It's different if you intend to eat it or need it to survive, but just to kill it to say "I killed this, isn't it great?"

To those that take these lives - I'd like you to take out a deer with your bare hands - on equal terms - or perhaps a bear.

I know this is out of topic and will be Last post in the SEIV regarding this.

KiloOhm · #6 April 3rd, 2001, 07:06 PM

quote:
Originally posted by capt_spoogy:
[b]Some additional Comments:

I must admit that I'm against hunting for sport. I think it is stupid - what kind of challenge is it to kill an animal with a high power rifle?

What's the problem with going out with a camera, finding the animals and taking a nice picture of it? What purpose does it serve to kill it for sport? It's different if you intend to eat it or need it to survive, but just to kill it to say "I killed this, isn't it great?"
B]

I don't hunt, but I'm friends with a lot of them. Hunting for sport IS stupid, however, probably 99% of hunters eat the meat of the animal they kill, which in my book is fine. Unless your a vegitarian, noone should be putting down hunters, they are MUCH MUCH more cruel to animals (like cows and chickens) that are used by the beef / poultry industry than a hunter could possibly be.

As far as the bullet logo goes. It IS a wargaming forum. I don't condone war or killing but I do find the weapons / tactics facinating. I think of it more like a game of chess than anything else (which is just a very abstracted war game in itself). Your child should be educated enough (by YOU not the forum) to understand the difference between seeing a bullet and killing someone.

I'm not bashing anyone, just stating my take on it...

------------------
Regards,
KiloOhm

Suicide Junkie · #7 April 3rd, 2001, 09:20 PM

I'm just saying that the bullet dosent go with "intel". If your spy killed someone, the authorities would be all over him/her and the operation would fail.
Something with a more "sneaky" spy theme would be better IMO, for an intel forum.

Try a cloaked figure whispering to someone, or a guy going through a file cabinet with a flashlight, that sort of thing.