|
|
|
 |
|

October 14th, 2008, 02:46 PM
|
Major
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,226
Thanks: 12
Thanked 86 Times in 48 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
That map should be banned, period.
|

October 14th, 2008, 03:05 PM
|
 |
Major General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,435
Thanks: 57
Thanked 662 Times in 142 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
I don't know...I'm enjoying it! 
__________________
My guides to Mictlan, MA Atlantis, Eriu, Sauromatia, Marverni, HINNOM, LA Atlantis, Bandar, MA Ulm, Machaka, Helheim, Niefleheim, EA Caelum, MA Oceana, EA Ulm, EA Arco, MA Argatha, LA Pangaea, MA T'ien Ch'i, MA Abysia, EA Atlantis, EA Pangaea, Shinuyama, Communions, Vampires, and Thugs
Baalz good player pledge
|

October 14th, 2008, 03:11 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tel Aviv, Israel
Posts: 3,465
Thanks: 511
Thanked 162 Times in 86 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Micah
That map should be banned, period.
|
I 2nd Micah. The map is IMO unfair, I wasn't aware to what degree, or I'd have bowed out of this one. OtOH the artifacts concept is way too cool to turn down.
|

October 14th, 2008, 03:28 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,687
Thanks: 20
Thanked 54 Times in 39 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
awful map, especially in the east.
|

October 14th, 2008, 04:24 PM
|
 |
Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: in a sleepy daze
Posts: 1,678
Thanks: 116
Thanked 57 Times in 33 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Can we turn quickhost off just for this turn? Somehow I sent in my turn last night immediately after receiving the turn file. Thanks
In future, i'd prefer artifacts that could not be sold or given away. 
__________________
i crossed blades with the mightiest warriors of the golden age. i witnessed with sorrow the schism that led to the passing of legends. now my sword hangs in its scabbard, with nothing but memories to keep it warm.
|

October 14th, 2008, 11:36 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Patala is a pussy.
Sorry Patala, just trying to get this game done. I thought I should taunt you. Kill me now, please.
|

October 15th, 2008, 05:38 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Berlin, Germany
Posts: 790
Thanks: 7
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Gath is interested in astral and death gems. I can trade you other gems for it - nature/earth/water and in small amounts fire/air.
I also offer to pay for it in gold.
Just PM me if you're interested.
|

October 15th, 2008, 07:58 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant Colonel
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 1,333
Thanks: 39
Thanked 59 Times in 43 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeldor
Sailing should be banned on that map.
|
What's wrong with sailing?
Nah, seriously. Indeed this isn't the most balanced map around, and it is indeed perfect to exploit sailing to the fullest. I do enjoy it however, precisely because it presents different tactical challanges to the average map.
And I'm quite sure I would have said the same even if I weren't one of the nations that really benefited from it. 
|

October 15th, 2008, 09:23 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Irving, TX
Posts: 3,207
Thanks: 54
Thanked 60 Times in 35 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
C'mon Amhazair, the map sucks for most of the players. Too many chokepoints. Granted, I am almost dead, and have little to say on these matters. It's a very nice SP map though.
|

October 16th, 2008, 12:19 AM
|
Captain
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 947
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: The Artifacts Game - [ running ]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lingchih
Patala is a pussy.
Sorry Patala, just trying to get this game done. I thought I should taunt you. Kill me now, please.
|
Haha... you're right I am a pussy.
But ... I mean, for real, why should I lose troops in an invasion when I can just preach you out? You've only got 1 candle left. Feel free to break siege, I'd rather fight outside where there are no ballista shooting at me, plus I would get first go.
My nation is of very meager means. I have lost 40 turns fighting you and I don't care if it goes on a few more if it means I can keep more experienced troops for later.
We have had a good war, haven't we? I wish we were the only two players in the game, haha. Then I would win!!  Instead I am dead last after you are gone. 
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|