|
|
|
 |

February 28th, 2001, 02:45 AM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Randallstown, Maryland, USA
Posts: 779
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Adding maintenance to buildings
Is it possible to assign a resource usage to a facility to cover the costs associated with operating the building? This would simulate the food for the workers, power usage etc.
|

February 27th, 2001, 03:19 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Texas
Posts: 830
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Adding maintenance to buildings
Right now, only ships/bases pay maintenance. In order for maintenance to be required on facilities, this would require a fundamental alteration in the game engine by Malfador.
|

February 27th, 2001, 04:04 PM
|
 |
Captain
|
|
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 806
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Adding maintenance to buildings
You could impose a requirement on yourself (and like-minded human players) that facilities be supported by ships. For example, every five facilities would require an escort filled with cargo bays. That would impose a maintenance cost.
But the AI won't oblige you.
__________________
Give me a scenario editor, or give me death! Pretty please???
|

February 27th, 2001, 10:14 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Randallstown, Maryland, USA
Posts: 779
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Adding maintenance to buildings
Would it be possible to give a building the resource generation ability and have the number of resources generated be negative?
[This message has been edited by Nitram Draw (edited 27 February 2001).]
|

February 27th, 2001, 10:20 PM
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: california
Posts: 2,961
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Adding maintenance to buildings
>Would it be possible to give a building the resource generation ability
yes.
>and have the number of resources generated be negative?
maybe, have to try it. if you CAN, then the maintnance for the building would be worse on a happy, high population, high resource percentile planet than it would be on a poor one. which would suck. also, your resource bonus from your race would work against you, and your maintnance bonus would have no effect. sort of lame.
__________________
...the green, sticky spawn of the stars
(with apologies to H.P.L.)
|

February 27th, 2001, 11:33 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Randallstown, Maryland, USA
Posts: 779
Thanks: 8
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Adding maintenance to buildings
Yes that is true you would pay more because it is a percentage modified by bonuses. I was thinking of small numbers that would add up over the course of time.
I look at it this way:
A happy planet is more wasteful, not to concerned with conservation, things are good.
A planet with low organic or radioactives has learned to operate efficiently, given they have to live on the planet with the low resources so they would pay less actual resources.
A planet with high resources has huge companies controlling the resources. I don't think the intergalactic Version of Exxon/Mobil will hose us any less than they do now.
Also, it would give me a reason to build organic farms. Don't seem to use much organics unless I pick the organic trait.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|