|  | 
| 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
    
    
 |  | 
 
 
	
		|  |  |  
	
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 20th, 2007, 11:30 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: La La Land (California, USA) 
						Posts: 1,244
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Lack of supplies... 
 One of my armies lacked 26 supply units.  It did not get them.  As a result,about 250 units got diseased.  This is more than 50% of the troops, and
 about 10 times as many men as supplies were lacking.
 
 Now, it was only my fault I let the guys starve - I had no time to take the
 turn.  But seriously, shouldn't only the weakest X units get a disease when
 only X supplies are missing?
 
				__________________No good deed goes unpunished...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 01:32 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: R'lyeh 
						Posts: 3,861
					 Thanks: 144 
		
			
				Thanked 403 Times in 176 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 Sounds fishy. Only units that were already starving the turn before should have gone diseased, I think. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 01:41 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major General |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Columbus, OH 
						Posts: 2,204
					 Thanks: 67 
		
			
				Thanked 49 Times in 31 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 You might have walked into a province with a disease causing site.
 Jazzepi
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 07:10 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 National Security Advisor |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Oxford, UK 
						Posts: 5,921
					 Thanks: 194 
		
			
				Thanked 855 Times in 291 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 That doesn't sound normal for lack of supplies. I've had an army that's been 10% starving for ages (maybe 10 turns), and it's mostly fine. |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 07:25 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: La La Land (California, USA) 
						Posts: 1,244
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 I had searched the province at level 3-4 for anything but fire and blood.I found no bad sites.  It has white man's hill(!), another good site, and
 something that causes 5 points of unrest.
 
 In any case, the number of diseased troops is extremely close to 50%.
 It's a shooty army, so I would not be surprised if it is exactly 50 plus
 the few units who were diseased before the disaster.
 
				__________________No good deed goes unpunished...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 09:23 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Sergeant |  | 
					Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Poznań, Poland 
						Posts: 340
					 Thanks: 1 
		
			
				Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 Is that something that causes 5 points of unrest called Inkpot  something by chance? Because that site spreads disease... |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 10:36 AM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			
			| 
 Second Lieutenant |  | 
					Join Date: Nov 2004 
						Posts: 449
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 If any commanders got the disease, then it is from a site for sure. 
 And just a guess... does [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/icon49.gif[/img] [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/icon49.gif[/img] "something that causes 5 points of unrest" [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/icon49.gif[/img] [img]/threads/images/Graemlins/icon49.gif[/img] mean a blood site that you haven't searched for yet?
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 03:05 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Major |  | 
					Join Date: Apr 2004 Location: La La Land (California, USA) 
						Posts: 1,244
					 Thanks: 0 
		
			
				Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 Isn't the "Inkpot" a site that is always visible?  I know that I haveseen it before, and I also know that I have never blood searched a
 province in four years of playing Dominions II/III.  Maybe I saw it
 after an Acashic Record.
 
				__________________No good deed goes unpunished...
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 03:17 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 Colonel |  | 
					Join Date: May 2005 Location: Kansas, USA 
						Posts: 1,538
					 Thanks: 289 
		
			
				Thanked 194 Times in 94 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 Crown of Darkness is a level 4 death site that causes disease.  Also consider sneaking disease spreaders (especially in multiplayer).
 Inkpot End is a level 0 site and should be visible instantly.
 |  
	
		
	
	
	| 
			
			 
			
				July 21st, 2007, 06:20 PM
			
			
			
		 |  
	| 
		
			|  | 
 General |  | 
					Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Sweden 
						Posts: 4,463
					 Thanks: 25 
		
			
				Thanked 92 Times in 43 Posts
			
		
	      |  |  
    
	| 
				 Re: Lack of supplies... 
 I'm not sure how starvation works, but it should not cause 50%+ diseased troops in one turn. You should get one turn of warning and regular starvation. Next turn those units with a starvation tag are eligible to disease IIRC. Starving is somewhat proportional to supplies, but I'm not sure to what extent. A large starving army is probably affected worse than a small one, but I'm not sure. |  
	
		
	
	
	
	
	
	
	| 
	|  Posting Rules |  
	| 
		
		You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts 
 HTML code is On 
 |  |  |  |  |