|
|
|
 |
|

March 11th, 2008, 11:44 PM
|
 |
Major
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: La La Land (California, USA)
Posts: 1,244
Thanks: 0
Thanked 30 Times in 11 Posts
|
|
Armies moving against each other
The manual suggests that when two big armies move against each other, the
larger is somewhat likely to push back the smaller one, and invade the
enemy province. I'm playing Ermor in a test game, and moved four 500+
armies against Ulm. Not once, but four times out of four, my hordes were
pushed back by armies numbering in the twenties.
Can one of the developers look into it? I would not be surprised if a
comparison operator is inverted somewhere. Or maybe undeads' numerical
superiority does not count.
__________________
No good deed goes unpunished...
|

March 12th, 2008, 02:02 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
Quote:
Tuidjy said:
The manual suggests that when two big armies move against each other, the
larger is somewhat likely to push back the smaller one, and invade the
enemy province. I'm playing Ermor in a test game, and moved four 500+
armies against Ulm. Not once, but four times out of four, my hordes were
pushed back by armies numbering in the twenties.
|
I can also verify this unfortunate event. It's happened even in a recent MP game where my 100 mercenary troops were pushed back by an army of 15 men.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

March 12th, 2008, 02:38 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
IF that's indeed the case, it looks like the comparison sign is switched the wrong way around or something equally simple that doesn't throw up code errors but results in strange behavior. Worth looking into.
|

March 12th, 2008, 02:59 AM
|
BANNED USER
|
|
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,075
Thanks: 203
Thanked 121 Times in 91 Posts
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
I have always thought it was related to the slowest speed in the army, with a caveat that armies may not be detected.
As Ermor is exceedingly slow, this usually means the location of the battlefield is usually the opponents choice.
|

March 12th, 2008, 04:10 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: az
Posts: 3,069
Thanks: 41
Thanked 39 Times in 28 Posts
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
Quote:
chrispedersen said:
I have always thought it was related to the slowest speed in the army, with a caveat that armies may not be detected.
As Ermor is exceedingly slow, this usually means the location of the battlefield is usually the opponents choice.
|
I hope this is not what's happening... otherwise a fast small army could prevent a stronger opponent from advancing causing balance concerns.
__________________
There can be only one.
|

March 12th, 2008, 06:12 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
I've had this happen as well, although not with the disparity you have.
Twice I've had my army try to invade a province and twice I've been pushed back and both times I won the battle. However that was largely due to spells as I was outnumbered and outclassed in troops both times so it may be largey random with people just not noticing when the huge army attacks and pushes back the smaller one.
Another worrying thought I had was that movement order may be determined by unit ID, so certain commanders will keep being pushed back due to an attribute you can't see...
|

March 12th, 2008, 06:59 AM
|
 |
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: A little pool
Posts: 94
Thanks: 15
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
I have an impression that sometimes the movement order is determined by nation number(especially when summon the unique units or an army move into an enemy province from where the opponent launch attack to somewhere else). It seems like the nation with the smaller nation number always take action first.
__________________
"The end. Aaaaaaaah! Splat! Finished."
"Things like that must happen."
|

March 12th, 2008, 07:08 AM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Helsinki, Finland
Posts: 5,425
Thanks: 174
Thanked 695 Times in 267 Posts
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
If anyone bothers to set up a few tests and run them, it would be much appreciated.
|

March 27th, 2008, 10:41 AM
|
 |
Private
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Oulu, Finland
Posts: 40
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
This leading to armies being prevented moves with scouts on retreat orders...
|

March 27th, 2008, 10:48 AM
|
Second Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Toulouse, France
Posts: 579
Thanks: 2
Thanked 12 Times in 6 Posts
|
|
Re: Armies moving against each other
I happened to me on a recent game. I was pushed back by a smaller army that lost the fight. I just makes no sense...
The modification I would suggest when armies fight each other (and I'm not even speaking of the problems it causes when armies regroup) is make them fight regardless of movement and only then decide where the armies move (or not). The worst being against the AI where I had the case where a dozen units blocked a 500-man army for 7 turns. Or just let the largest force push the other one around.
__________________
Often I must speak other than I think. That is called diplomacy.
* Stilgar
Show me a completely smooth operation and I'll show you a cover up. Real boats rock.
* Darwi Odrade
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|