|
|
|
 |

November 18th, 2002, 06:17 PM
|
First Lieutenant
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Posts: 790
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
disrupt reload time vs increase reload time
Is there any difference between these two abilities (besides the latter not working against Master Computers?)
Search on the topic came up with this:
Phoenix-D: Actually the two weapons do different things. One increases reload time the other disrupts it. AFAIK shooting the Energy Dampener at a ship armed with APBs or PPBs won't have any effect, where the Flailer will.
Baron Munchausen: The difference between energy dampener and mental flailer is that one affects energy (dampener, the 'disrupt reload time' power) while the other affects minds (the 'increase reload time' power). So, the Energy Dampener will affect any ship, while the Flailer only affects ships with crews, NOT ships with Master Computers!
Thanks,
-Spoon
|

November 18th, 2002, 06:46 PM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: UK
Posts: 4,245
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: disrupt reload time vs increase reload time
Uhh, from what you've found there, I would say that the only difference is the Master Computer thing.
Seems like a wierd way of going about it. It would make more sense (to me) to have one ability which has the weapon-delaying effect ad another which specifies "does not work on Master Computers". That would give modders much more to play with.
|

November 18th, 2002, 10:59 PM
|
 |
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 8,806
Thanks: 54
Thanked 33 Times in 31 Posts
|
|
Re: disrupt reload time vs increase reload time
Ya, then you could have:
Bio-Microwave Ray - causes crew members to explode like sausages in a microwave oven, damaging the ship. Does not work on ships with master computers.
There should actually be two (or several, ideally, for other conditions) categories:
1) Doesn't work on targets with master computers.
2) Only works on targets with crew quarters.
in order to get the correct effects on ships with both types of control.
PvK
|

November 19th, 2002, 12:46 AM
|
 |
General
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Pittsburgh, PA, USA
Posts: 3,070
Thanks: 13
Thanked 9 Times in 8 Posts
|
|
Re: disrupt reload time vs increase reload time
Quote:
It would make more sense (to me) to have one ability which has the weapon-delaying effect ad another which specifies "does not work on Master Computers".
|
How is this different from what's there now?
__________________
Cap'n Q
"Good morning, Pooh Bear," said Eeyore gloomily. "If it is a good morning," he said. "Which I doubt," said he.
|

November 19th, 2002, 12:52 AM
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2000
Posts: 5,085
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
Re: disrupt reload time vs increase reload time
"How is this different from what's there now?"
You can specifcy exactly which weapons will and won't affect ships with MCs, for one.
Phoenix-D
__________________
Phoenix-D
I am not senile. I just talk to myself because the rest of you don't provide adequate conversation.
- Digger
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|