|
|
|
Notices |
Do you own this game? Write a review and let others know how you like it.
|
|
|
October 31st, 2019, 11:29 AM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
Is anybody else having this issue?
Especially noticeable with ATGMs with a long minimum range like cobras.
They do only get a 1% hit chance but they now take the shot instead of holding fire.
__________________
John
|
October 31st, 2019, 11:37 AM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
They definitely should not be doing this.
Presumably AI held weapons?
Opfire or regular fire?
|
October 31st, 2019, 03:25 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 97
Thanks: 552
Thanked 43 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
I've seen this recently too. In my case:
AI weapon - Malutkas
Op fire when I almost ran over the hidden ATGM team.
The 1% hit chance sounds familiar, a very low percentage like that.
It was a long campaign scenario, 1970s (if that matters).
I don't see it a lot, probably more of an Op fire situation when I end up on top of or very near the ATGM team.
Steves308
|
October 31st, 2019, 03:57 PM
|
|
General
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Uk
Posts: 3,308
Thanks: 98
Thanked 602 Times in 476 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
Certainly under opfire but I think regular fire to
__________________
John
|
October 31st, 2019, 04:56 PM
|
|
Shrapnel Fanatic
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: GWN
Posts: 12,492
Thanks: 3,963
Thanked 5,702 Times in 2,814 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
If anyone can provide us with a save that will show it happening on replay that would be helpful.
|
October 31st, 2019, 06:07 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
Oh - if these were Sagger teams, then those usually have a RPG-7 to cover the 0-500m dead zone. Maybe you were seeing an RPG shot?.
|
October 31st, 2019, 07:50 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
Bug confirmed - AI v AI game, all tanks start within 500m of saggers, saggers fired at 1% to hit.
Something to put on the to-fix list.
|
November 1st, 2019, 04:29 AM
|
|
Lieutenant General
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 2,829
Thanks: 542
Thanked 797 Times in 602 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mobhack
Bug confirmed - AI v AI game, all tanks start within 500m of saggers, saggers fired at 1% to hit.
Something to put on the to-fix list.
|
Interesting bug.
Maybe has something to do with the RPG that's typically part of Sagger teams (i.e. a 2nd AT class weapon)? Don't recall ever seeing it in TOW/Dragon/Javelin teams.
__________________
Suhiir - Wargame Junkie
People should not be afraid of their governments. Governments should be afraid of their people.
"Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sure about the the universe." - Albert Einstein
|
November 1st, 2019, 01:37 PM
|
Corporal
|
|
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 97
Thanks: 552
Thanked 43 Times in 30 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
I don't think it was the RPG, as that weapon usually followed the ATGM and got my tank ;^)
But Suhiir has a point, I don't think I've seen it with an ATGM team that doesn't have a backup type of anti-tank weapon.
Steves308
|
November 1st, 2019, 04:08 PM
|
|
National Security Advisor
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Dundee
Posts: 5,956
Thanks: 465
Thanked 1,899 Times in 1,237 Posts
|
|
Re: ATGM's firing at below minimum range.
I just tried that test with Italian cobras, which have no RPG. The AI fired one at about 350 yards by itself, but the rest stayed silent until the tanks moved , when the cobras started to fire within minimum range as big bottle rockets.
So the RPG is a factor in AI firing in regular fire, but the things do fire in opfire as well.
I also started manually, and the game fired the cobras manually at tanks within 500m as well.
So - something has gone squiffy with the minimum range code (if it ever worked - I cant think of any time I have tried firing ATGM within knife range in the last 20 years, myself!).
I suppose it could be rationalised as "fire what you have and pray for a Hail Mary" since in one test a 1% sagger made the hit when fired as a bottle rocket. But the programmer in me wants to find out why it is firing out of parameters and fix that as a bug.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Mobhack For This Useful Post:
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Hybrid Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is On
|
|
|
|
|