Question on refusing Treaties.

[Talenn]

In an effort to make the AI more aggressive, I am going through the 'AI_Anger' file. In there, I see an entry for the AI's anger to increase (by a fairly significant amount) if a treaty is refused.

My question is: What happens if the treaty request is just ignored instead of refused? There doesnt seem to be any penalty for that and that defeats the purpose of that particular 'Anger Mod' IMO. Would it be possible (or does it do it now and I just dont notice) for the AI to treat any ignored treaty request as refused?

Thanx,
Talenn

[Psitticine]

Am I misremembering or aren't ignored treaties "withdrawn" (disappear from the diplomatic screen) after a while? Maybe that counts as a refusal.

[Jubala]

I would say the AI should get more upset if a treaty is ignored then if it's rejected. I would be anyway. And it shouldn't be too upset if it is rejected. After all it's no big deal really.

[Talenn]

I did some experimenting and there is definately a 'diplomatic penalty' associated with responding with a refusal. There does NOT appear to be any penalty for just not responding at all.

I think this amounts to a pretty major flaw in the diplomacy model and probably accounts for alot of the reason why the AI is so darned peaceful. I think that is really the only thing I find severely lacking in this game...CONFLICT! Very few demands for gifts...very few ultimatums. Very little of anything except treaty requests actually.

Maybe my play style is completely different than most, but I feel like the AI is always wanting treaties. I miss the surprise of a quick AI war/attack as in MOO/MOO2. Even in SE3 you could tailor the AI players so as to have 'Conquerors' or 'Xenophobes' or 'Marauders' etc. This made for conflict and unpredicability in the game and greatly added to the game experience.

Nearly every game I've played of SE4 so far (Max AI players, Hardest Level, Low Bonus) has resulted in HUGE stretches of peace punctuated by my extermination of one race at a time.

Even when the race is listed as 'berserk' or whatnot, its still the same old thing...treaty request after treaty request.

I've tried to edit some of the AI files to make them more aggressive but have had little success as long as the player plays it cool.

Anyone else have any success or experience AI player warlike tendancies?

Talenn

[alchemy]

quote:

---

Anyone else have any success or experience AI player warlike tendancies?

---

This may be well known to the more experienced, players, but ...

I was trying to play a peaceful game, with a "tiered" approach to allies (one partnership, one military alliance, etc.). I was refusing treaty "upgrades".

Then, all of a sudden, after a long stretch of peace, where relations were all very warm and brotherly, within two turns all of them declared war on me. I believe that this may have been precipitated when my score became greater than 500, does this sound correct?

So, no warlike tendencies, just a strong, unified reaction to the perceived strength of my empire. FWIW, my counter-intel did stop an attempt earlier by one empire that I had no treaty with.

[Talenn]

Mithras:

Yes, that is the 'Mega Evil AI' kicking in. It is set for the 500 mark in your score. All AI players will hate you, but I've found that there is usually not a lot that they can do at that point. Its just mop up anyways in my games.

What I am looking for is instances earlier in the game where the AI is the aggressor for seemingly little or no reason...ie a THREAT.

Thanx though, at least we know at SOME point, the AI will fight back.

Talenn