Poll: Damage Types

Saber Cherry · #1 October 14th, 2003, 06:56 PM

I'm curious about the spread of opinions.

Kristoffer O · #2 October 14th, 2003, 06:58 PM

Ha, I was the first one this time.

Nerfix · #3 October 14th, 2003, 07:05 PM

"They would be interesting and beneficial, if designed carefully to have moderate effects."

That's what i voted for. If balanced and well thougth out, the system would/could/will be good.
It's all about balance.

PDF · #4 October 14th, 2003, 10:08 PM

Bah, don't want it !
It'll add eventually +3% gameplay for +20% micromanagement, at the dev cost of 5 patches that could be used for MUCH better improvements

!
It'll be mostly a waste of resources, forget about that ..

Gandalf Parker · #5 October 14th, 2003, 10:57 PM

I think it might be a system that the developers could use to make sure there is balance in the game. But it doesnt need to be something that the players HAVE to work with if they dont want to. It could all be background stuff for the discussion of the addicted people the way the number formulas were for Dom 1.

If different weapons had different attacks, different armors had different defense bonuses, different sizes, mounts, forms (mist, ethereal, etc) all had different things which affected at different levels then the variety might help keep any ONE strategy from getting out of hand.

Of course everything would damage everything, just at slightly different levels. Plus they could insure that each race had a variety of pluses and minuses, but not covering everything.

Gandalf Parker

[ October 14, 2003, 21:58: Message edited by: Gandalf Parker ]

Aristoteles · #6 October 14th, 2003, 11:34 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Gandalf Parker:

Of course everything would damage everything, just at slightly different levels. Plus they could insure that each race had a variety of pluses and minuses, but not covering everything.

Gandalf Parker

Yup.