.com.unity Forums
  The Official e-Store of Shrapnel Games

This Month's Specials

Raging Tiger- Save $9.00
winSPMBT: Main Battle Tank- Save $6.00

   







Go Back   .com.unity Forums > Shrapnel Community > Space Empires: IV & V

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 12:32 AM
dmm's Avatar

dmm dmm is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 806
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dmm is on a distinguished road
Default Unrealistic Movement Point System

As I've been posting to a "Retreat Rule" topic and to a "Planetary Bombardment" topic over the Last week or so, it has occurred to me that the whole movement point (MP) system is not very realistic. Consider a fleet with 6 MP. In one turn, it can either
a) move 6 sectors, or
b) move 2 sectors and have a 30-turn combat, during which it lands troops and fights a land war. Then it can re-embark the troops and lay some mines. Then it can move 2 more sectors and do the same thing, and then move 2 more sectors and do the same thing!

I'm not saying this isn't fun. If it's never "fixed" I won't care too much. But I would prefer a more realistic system. Perhaps something as simple as penalizing you 1 MP for things like battles, ground assaults, troop embarkment, cargo loading, refueling, minelaying, etc. Or maybe not a whole MP. Maybe just a fraction of 1, and you only get penalized if you abuse the system and do a bunch of stuff all in one turn.
__________________
Give me a scenario editor, or give me death! Pretty please???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 12:49 AM

apache apache is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 93
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
apache is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

From what I recall, it already costs MPs to colonize, battle, most stellar manipulations, and lots of other things. As far as troop embarkment/debarkment, refueling, and other ship/ship or ship/planet transfers, I think its safe to assume some form of instantaneous star trek-ish beaming transport. But yes, troops should be confined to a planet for the rest of the turn if they were landed in a battle. There are also limits on minelaying, so I don't know why you are arguing that point.
Also, while this is a nice subject to debate, I would never post anything decrying "realism" here since the game pretty much ignores most laws of physics.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 12:50 AM
Instar's Avatar

Instar Instar is offline
Major
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Instar is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

Actually, to engage in battle, you do have to have one move point. (the way I saw this was when a battle was a tie and both sides still had ships left, click on attack, and click on your sector. If you don't have moves you cant fight)
__________________
When a cat is dropped, it always lands on its feet, and when toast is dropped, it always lands with the buttered side facing down. I propose to strap buttered toast to the back of a cat. The two will hover, spinning inches above the ground. With a giant buttered cat array, a high-speed monorail could easily link New York with Chicago.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 12:53 AM
dmm's Avatar

dmm dmm is offline
Captain
 
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: USA
Posts: 806
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
dmm is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

quote:
Originally posted by Instar:
Actually, to engage in battle, you do have to have one move point

True. And that's a good rule, even though it is inconsistent with everything else. For example, if you fight first and then move, you get penalized 1 MP for the battle. But if you move first and then fight, you don't get penalized.
__________________
Give me a scenario editor, or give me death! Pretty please???
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 05:05 PM
Seawolf's Avatar

Seawolf Seawolf is offline
Second Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: New York, New York USA
Posts: 480
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Seawolf is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

Um has anyone considered the time scale here? Isn't 1 turn 1 month? I think alot can be done in a month.

------------------
Seawolf on the prowl
__________________
Seawolf on the prowl
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old January 23rd, 2001, 05:25 PM

SirDarwin SirDarwin is offline
Corporal
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Ottawa,Ontario
Posts: 99
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
SirDarwin is on a distinguished road
Default Re: Unrealistic Movement Point System

Then again, in most sci-fi it doesn't even 1 month to move across your own star system...so its all a little out of wack
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©1999 - 2024, Shrapnel Games, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.